CWE-613 Base Incompleto

Insufficient Session Expiration

Insufficient session expiration occurs when an application allows old session tokens or IDs to remain valid for too long, letting attackers reuse them to gain unauthorized access.

Definição

What is CWE-613?

Insufficient session expiration occurs when an application allows old session tokens or IDs to remain valid for too long, letting attackers reuse them to gain unauthorized access.
This vulnerability happens because sessions don't expire quickly or securely enough. Common causes include overly long timeout periods, missing logout functions that invalidate tokens on the server, or sessions that persist indefinitely after a user closes their browser. Attackers can steal these lingering session credentials through techniques like cross-site scripting or session fixation, then impersonate legitimate users long after they've left the application. To prevent this, enforce short, absolute session timeouts, implement secure logout that destroys server-side session data, and tie sessions to client attributes like IP address or user agent. Regularly rotate session IDs after login or privilege changes. While SAST tools can detect the pattern, Plexicus uses AI to analyze session management flows and suggest precise code fixes—like implementing proper invalidation logic—saving hours of manual review and reducing risk across your entire application stack.
Impacto no mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-613

Ainda não há referências CVE públicas associadas a este CWE no catálogo da MITRE.

Como os atacantes a exploram

Trajeto do atacante passo a passo

  1. 1

    Identificar um caminho de código que trata input não confiável sem validação.

  2. 2

    Criar um payload que explora o comportamento inseguro — injeção, traversal, overflow ou abuso de lógica.

  3. 3

    Entregar o payload através de um pedido normal e observar a reação da aplicação.

  4. 4

    Iterar até que a resposta exponha dados, execute código do atacante ou escale privilégios.

Exemplo de código vulnerável

Vulnerable Java

The following snippet was taken from a J2EE web.xml deployment descriptor in which the session-timeout parameter is explicitly defined (the default value depends on the container). In this case the value is set to -1, which means that a session will never expire.

Vulnerável Java
<web-app>
  		[...snipped...]
  		<session-config>
  			<session-timeout>-1</session-timeout>
  		</session-config>
  </web-app>
Exemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de verificação de prevenção

How to prevent CWE-613

  • Implementation Set sessions/credentials expiration date.
Sinais de deteção

How to detect CWE-613

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

CWE-613

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Perguntas frequentes

Frequently asked questions

O que é o CWE-613?

Insufficient session expiration occurs when an application allows old session tokens or IDs to remain valid for too long, letting attackers reuse them to gain unauthorized access.

Qual a gravidade do CWE-613?

A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.

Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-613?

A MITRE não especificou as plataformas afetadas por este CWE — pode aplicar-se à maioria das stacks de aplicações.

Como posso prevenir o CWE-613?

Set sessions/credentials expiration date.

Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-613?

O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-613 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.

Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-613?

A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/613.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.

Fraquezas relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-613

Pronto para validar o que importa?

Pronto para validar o que importa.

O Plexicus é Proof-Driven AppSec: achados validados, compreensão contextual e remediação revisada — ancorada em evidência, escopada com você.

Qualificação

Verifique se o AI Swarm Pentest se adequa ao seu ambiente.

Partilhe o contexto mínimo. Vamos rever o escopo e indicar o próximo passo comercial.

Antes de enviar — verifique se se encaixa

0 / 280

Sem compromisso. Se não se encaixa, dizemos.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Ronda privada Para investidores