CWE-51 Variante Incompleto

Path Equivalence: '/multiple//internal/slash'

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts file or directory paths containing multiple consecutive forward slashes (e.g., '/var//www///html') without normalizing them. Attackers can…

Definição

What is CWE-51?

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts file or directory paths containing multiple consecutive forward slashes (e.g., '/var//www///html') without normalizing them. Attackers can exploit this ambiguity to bypass security checks and access files or directories outside the intended scope.
File systems and path parsers often treat sequences like '//', '///', or '////' as equivalent to a single slash ('/'). While this might seem harmless, security mechanisms that check for directory traversal sequences (like '../') might not recognize a path like '/secure//../sensitive.txt' as malicious. This creates a mismatch between how the security filter sees the path and how the operating system ultimately resolves it, allowing an attacker to slip through. To prevent this, developers should implement strict path validation by normalizing all user-supplied paths before processing. Use canonical functions provided by your programming language (like `realpath()` in PHP or `Path.GetFullPath()` in .NET) to resolve any redundant slashes and directory traversals to a single, absolute, and clean path. Always validate this final path against a strict allow-list of permitted directories, never relying solely on blacklists or simple string matching.
Impacto no mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-51

  • Read files with full pathname using multiple internal slash.

Como os atacantes a exploram

Trajeto do atacante passo a passo

  1. 1

    Identificar um caminho de código que trata input não confiável sem validação.

  2. 2

    Criar um payload que explora o comportamento inseguro — injeção, traversal, overflow ou abuso de lógica.

  3. 3

    Entregar o payload através de um pedido normal e observar a reação da aplicação.

  4. 4

    Iterar até que a resposta exponha dados, execute código do atacante ou escale privilégios.

Exemplo de código vulnerável

Vulnerable pseudo

A MITRE não publicou um exemplo de código para este CWE. O padrão abaixo é ilustrativo — consulte os Recursos para referências canónicas.

Vulnerável pseudo
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
  // Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
  return executeUnsafe(input);
}
Exemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de verificação de prevenção

How to prevent CWE-51

  • Implementation Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
Sinais de deteção

How to detect CWE-51

SAST High

Executar análise estática (SAST) na base de código à procura do padrão inseguro no fluxo de dados.

DAST Moderate

Executar testes dinâmicos de segurança de aplicações (DAST) contra o endpoint em execução.

Runtime Moderate

Monitorizar os registos em tempo de execução para traços de exceção invulgares, input malformado ou tentativas de contornar a autorização.

Code review Moderate

Revisão de código: sinalizar qualquer novo código que trate input desta superfície sem usar os ajudantes validados do framework.

CWE-51

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Perguntas frequentes

Frequently asked questions

O que é o CWE-51?

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts file or directory paths containing multiple consecutive forward slashes (e.g., '/var//www///html') without normalizing them. Attackers can exploit this ambiguity to bypass security checks and access files or directories outside the intended scope.

Qual a gravidade do CWE-51?

A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.

Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-51?

A MITRE não especificou as plataformas afetadas por este CWE — pode aplicar-se à maioria das stacks de aplicações.

Como posso prevenir o CWE-51?

Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.

Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-51?

O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-51 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.

Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-51?

A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/51.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.

Fraquezas relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-51

CWE-41 Pai

Improper Resolution of Path Equivalence

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly handle different text representations that refer to the same file or…

CWE-42 Irmão

Path Equivalence: 'filename.' (Trailing Dot)

This vulnerability occurs when a system accepts file or directory paths that end with a dot (like 'file.txt.' or 'folder.') without…

CWE-44 Irmão

Path Equivalence: 'file.name' (Internal Dot)

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts file paths containing internal dots (like 'file.ordir') without properly checking…

CWE-46 Irmão

Path Equivalence: 'filename ' (Trailing Space)

This vulnerability occurs when an application processes file paths that end with a space character (like 'document.txt ') without properly…

CWE-47 Irmão

Path Equivalence: ' filename' (Leading Space)

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts file or directory paths that begin with a space character (like ' filename'),…

CWE-48 Irmão

Path Equivalence: 'file name' (Internal Whitespace)

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts file paths containing internal spaces (like 'file name') without proper validation.…

CWE-49 Irmão

Path Equivalence: 'filename/' (Trailing Slash)

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts file or directory paths that end with a slash (e.g., 'documents/') without properly…

CWE-50 Irmão

Path Equivalence: '//multiple/leading/slash'

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts file or directory paths containing multiple leading slashes (like…

CWE-52 Irmão

Path Equivalence: '/multiple/trailing/slash//'

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts file or directory paths containing multiple consecutive forward slashes (like…

Pronto para validar o que importa?

Pronto para validar o que importa.

O Plexicus é Proof-Driven AppSec: achados validados, compreensão contextual e remediação revisada — ancorada em evidência, escopada com você.

Qualificação

Verifique se o AI Swarm Pentest se adequa ao seu ambiente.

Partilhe o contexto mínimo. Vamos rever o escopo e indicar o próximo passo comercial.

Antes de enviar — verifique se se encaixa

0 / 280

Sem compromisso. Se não se encaixa, dizemos.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Ronda privada Para investidores