CWE-425 Base Incompleto

Direct Request ('Forced Browsing')

This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to verify user permissions for every protected page, file, or API endpoint, allowing attackers to access them directly.

Definição

What is CWE-425?

This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to verify user permissions for every protected page, file, or API endpoint, allowing attackers to access them directly.
Direct Request vulnerabilities happen because developers often assume users will only navigate through the intended application flow, like clicking buttons in a set sequence. They place authorization checks only at those expected entry points, forgetting that a user can simply type or forge a request to any URL or endpoint the server knows. This creates an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) risk, where attackers can 'force browse' by guessing or discovering hidden paths to administrative panels, configuration files, user data, or backend scripts. To prevent this, every single restricted resource must independently validate that the current session has explicit permission to access it, regardless of how the request was made.
Impacto no mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-425

  • Access-control setting in web-based document collaboration tool is not properly implemented by the code, which prevents listing hidden directories but does not prevent direct requests to files in those directories.

  • Python-based HTTP library did not scope cookies to a particular domain such that "supercookies" could be sent to any domain on redirect.

  • Bypass authentication via direct request.

  • Infinite loop or infoleak triggered by direct requests.

  • Bypass auth/auth via direct request.

  • Direct request leads to infoleak by error.

  • Direct request leads to infoleak by error.

  • Direct request leads to infoleak by error.

Como os atacantes a exploram

Trajeto do atacante passo a passo

  1. 1

    Identificar um caminho de código que trata input não confiável sem validação.

  2. 2

    Criar um payload que explora o comportamento inseguro — injeção, traversal, overflow ou abuso de lógica.

  3. 3

    Entregar o payload através de um pedido normal e observar a reação da aplicação.

  4. 4

    Iterar até que a resposta exponha dados, execute código do atacante ou escale privilégios.

Exemplo de código vulnerável

Vulnerable JSP

If forced browsing is possible, an attacker may be able to directly access a sensitive page by entering a URL similar to the following.

Vulnerável JSP
http://somesite.com/someapplication/admin.jsp
Payload do atacante

If forced browsing is possible, an attacker may be able to directly access a sensitive page by entering a URL similar to the following.

Payload do atacante JSP
http://somesite.com/someapplication/admin.jsp
Exemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de verificação de prevenção

How to prevent CWE-425

  • Architecture and Design / Operation Apply appropriate access control authorizations for each access to all restricted URLs, scripts or files.
  • Architecture and Design Consider using MVC based frameworks such as Struts.
Sinais de deteção

How to detect CWE-425

SAST High

Executar análise estática (SAST) na base de código à procura do padrão inseguro no fluxo de dados.

DAST Moderate

Executar testes dinâmicos de segurança de aplicações (DAST) contra o endpoint em execução.

Runtime Moderate

Monitorizar os registos em tempo de execução para traços de exceção invulgares, input malformado ou tentativas de contornar a autorização.

Code review Moderate

Revisão de código: sinalizar qualquer novo código que trate input desta superfície sem usar os ajudantes validados do framework.

CWE-425

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Perguntas frequentes

Frequently asked questions

O que é o CWE-425?

This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to verify user permissions for every protected page, file, or API endpoint, allowing attackers to access them directly.

Qual a gravidade do CWE-425?

A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.

Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-425?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Web Based.

Como posso prevenir o CWE-425?

Apply appropriate access control authorizations for each access to all restricted URLs, scripts or files. Consider using MVC based frameworks such as Struts.

Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-425?

O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-425 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.

Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-425?

A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/425.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.

Pronto para validar o que importa?

Pronto para validar o que importa.

O Plexicus é Proof-Driven AppSec: achados validados, compreensão contextual e remediação revisada — ancorada em evidência, escopada com você.

Qualificação

Verifique se o AI Swarm Pentest se adequa ao seu ambiente.

Partilhe o contexto mínimo. Vamos rever o escopo e indicar o próximo passo comercial.

Antes de enviar — verifique se se encaixa

0 / 280

Sem compromisso. Se não se encaixa, dizemos.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Ronda privada Para investidores