CWE-299 Base Rascunho Medium likelihood

Improper Check for Certificate Revocation

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly verify whether a security certificate has been revoked, potentially allowing it to accept and use a compromised or untrustworthy…

Definição

What is CWE-299?

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly verify whether a security certificate has been revoked, potentially allowing it to accept and use a compromised or untrustworthy certificate.
Failing to check certificate revocation is a critical security gap, more severe than other certificate errors. When a certificate is revoked, it's almost always because the associated private key has been exposed or the issuing authority no longer trusts it—meaning any system still using that certificate is likely compromised. Legitimate services should never operate with a revoked certificate unless they have a serious configuration or synchronization problem. For developers, this means your application could mistakenly trust a malicious actor impersonating a legitimate server. To prevent this, always implement and test proper revocation checking mechanisms like CRL (Certificate Revocation List) or OCSP (Online Certificate Status Protocol) in your TLS/SSL handshake logic, and ensure these checks cannot be bypassed by network errors or performance shortcuts.
Impacto no mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-299

  • LDAP-over-SSL implementation does not check Certificate Revocation List (CRL), allowing spoofing using a revoked certificate.

  • Operating system does not check Certificate Revocation List (CRL) in some cases, allowing spoofing using a revoked certificate.

  • Antivirus product does not check whether certificates from signed executables have been revoked.

  • Web browser does not check if any intermediate certificates are revoked.

  • chain: Ruby module for OCSP misinterprets a response, preventing detection of a revoked certificate.

  • chain: incorrect parsing of replies from OCSP responders allows bypass using a revoked certificate.

  • Router can permanently cache certain public keys, which would allow bypass if the certificate is later revoked.

  • chain: OS package manager does not properly check the return value, allowing bypass using a revoked certificate.

Como os atacantes a exploram

Trajeto do atacante passo a passo

  1. 1

    Identificar um caminho de código que trata input não confiável sem validação.

  2. 2

    Criar um payload que explora o comportamento inseguro — injeção, traversal, overflow ou abuso de lógica.

  3. 3

    Entregar o payload através de um pedido normal e observar a reação da aplicação.

  4. 4

    Iterar até que a resposta exponha dados, execute código do atacante ou escale privilégios.

Exemplo de código vulnerável

Vulnerable C

The following OpenSSL code ensures that there is a certificate before continuing execution.

Vulnerável C
if (cert = SSL_get_peer_certificate(ssl)) {
```
// got a certificate, do secret things*
Exemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de verificação de prevenção

How to prevent CWE-299

  • Architecture and Design Ensure that certificates are checked for revoked status.
  • Implementation If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the revoked status.
Sinais de deteção

How to detect CWE-299

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

CWE-299

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Perguntas frequentes

Frequently asked questions

O que é o CWE-299?

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly verify whether a security certificate has been revoked, potentially allowing it to accept and use a compromised or untrustworthy certificate.

Qual a gravidade do CWE-299?

A MITRE classifica a probabilidade de exploração como Média — a exploração é realista mas normalmente requer condições específicas.

Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-299?

A MITRE não especificou as plataformas afetadas por este CWE — pode aplicar-se à maioria das stacks de aplicações.

Como posso prevenir o CWE-299?

Ensure that certificates are checked for revoked status. If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the revoked status.

Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-299?

O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-299 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.

Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-299?

A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/299.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.

Pronto para validar o que importa?

Pronto para validar o que importa.

O Plexicus é Proof-Driven AppSec: achados validados, compreensão contextual e remediação revisada — ancorada em evidência, escopada com você.

Qualificação

Verifique se o AI Swarm Pentest se adequa ao seu ambiente.

Partilhe o contexto mínimo. Vamos rever o escopo e indicar o próximo passo comercial.

Antes de enviar — verifique se se encaixa

0 / 280

Sem compromisso. Se não se encaixa, dizemos.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Ronda privada Para investidores