CWE-256 Base Incompleto High likelihood

Plaintext Storage of a Password

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores user passwords as readable text instead of using secure, one-way hashing. This insecure practice exposes credentials in memory, files, or…

Definição

What is CWE-256?

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores user passwords as readable text instead of using secure, one-way hashing. This insecure practice exposes credentials in memory, files, or databases where attackers can easily retrieve them.
Storing passwords in plaintext is a critical security failure because it completely bypasses the fundamental purpose of password protection. If an attacker gains access to the storage—through a database breach, a leaked file, or a memory dump—they immediately obtain all user credentials. This often leads to account takeover, data theft, and lateral movement across systems, as users frequently reuse passwords. To prevent this, developers must never store the actual password. Instead, always use a strong, adaptive cryptographic hash function (like Argon2, scrypt, or bcrypt) with a unique salt for each password. This transforms the password into a fixed-length, irreversible string. Even if the hash is exposed, the original password remains computationally infeasible to recover, significantly limiting the damage of a data breach.
Vulnerability Diagram CWE-256
Plaintext Storage of Password User signs up pw="hunter2" users table name | password alice | hunter2 bob | letmein eve | qwerty DB dump → all passwords credential stuffing Passwords must be salted+hashed (bcrypt/argon2), never stored plain.
Impacto no mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-256

  • Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) uses a driver that relies on a password stored in plaintext.

Como os atacantes a exploram

Trajeto do atacante passo a passo

  1. 1

    The following code reads a password from a properties file and uses the password to connect to a database.

  2. 2

    This code will run successfully, but anyone who has access to config.properties can read the value of password. If a devious employee has access to this information, they can use it to break into the system.

  3. 3

    The following code reads a password from the registry and uses the password to create a new network credential.

  4. 4

    This code will run successfully, but anyone who has access to the registry key used to store the password can read the value of password. If a devious employee has access to this information, they can use it to break into the system

  5. 5

    The following examples show a portion of properties and configuration files for Java and ASP.NET applications. The files include username and password information but they are stored in cleartext.

Exemplo de código vulnerável

Vulnerable Java

The following code reads a password from a properties file and uses the password to connect to a database.

Vulnerável Java
...
  Properties prop = new Properties();
  prop.load(new FileInputStream("config.properties"));
  String password = prop.getProperty("password");
  DriverManager.getConnection(url, usr, password);
  ...
Exemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de verificação de prevenção

How to prevent CWE-256

  • Architecture and Design Avoid storing passwords in easily accessible locations.
  • Architecture and Design Consider storing cryptographic hashes of passwords as an alternative to storing in plaintext.
  • A programmer might attempt to remedy the password management problem by obscuring the password with an encoding function, such as base 64 encoding, but this effort does not adequately protect the password because the encoding can be detected and decoded easily.
Sinais de deteção

How to detect CWE-256

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

CWE-256

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Perguntas frequentes

Frequently asked questions

O que é o CWE-256?

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores user passwords as readable text instead of using secure, one-way hashing. This insecure practice exposes credentials in memory, files, or databases where attackers can easily retrieve them.

Qual a gravidade do CWE-256?

A MITRE classifica a probabilidade de exploração como Alta — esta fraqueza é ativamente explorada em campo e deve ser priorizada para remediação.

Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-256?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: ICS/OT.

Como posso prevenir o CWE-256?

Avoid storing passwords in easily accessible locations. Consider storing cryptographic hashes of passwords as an alternative to storing in plaintext.

Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-256?

O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-256 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.

Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-256?

A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/256.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.

Pronto para validar o que importa?

Pronto para validar o que importa.

O Plexicus é Proof-Driven AppSec: achados validados, compreensão contextual e remediação revisada — ancorada em evidência, escopada com você.

Qualificação

Verifique se o AI Swarm Pentest se adequa ao seu ambiente.

Partilhe o contexto mínimo. Vamos rever o escopo e indicar o próximo passo comercial.

Antes de enviar — verifique se se encaixa

0 / 280

Sem compromisso. Se não se encaixa, dizemos.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Ronda privada Para investidores