CWE-643 Base Incompleto High likelihood

Improper Neutralization of Data within XPath Expressions ('XPath Injection')

XPath Injection occurs when an application uses unvalidated user input to build an XPath query for an XML database. Without proper sanitization, attackers can manipulate the query's structure.

Definición

What is CWE-643?

XPath Injection occurs when an application uses unvalidated user input to build an XPath query for an XML database. Without proper sanitization, attackers can manipulate the query's structure.
This vulnerability allows an attacker to alter the intended logic of the XPath expression. By injecting special characters or control sequences, they can change which data is retrieved from the XML source, potentially bypassing application logic, authentication, or access controls. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized data exposure, information disclosure, or manipulation of application flow. Developers must treat all user input used in XPath queries as untrusted and implement proper validation or parameterization to prevent these attacks.
Impacto en el mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-643

Todavía no hay CVEs públicos enlazados a esta CWE en el catálogo de MITRE.

Cómo lo explotan los atacantes

Ruta del atacante paso a paso

  1. 1

    Consider the following simple XML document that stores authentication information and a snippet of Java code that uses XPath query to retrieve authentication information:

  2. 2

    The Java code used to retrieve the home directory based on the provided credentials is:

  3. 3

    Assume that user "john" wishes to leverage XPath Injection and login without a valid password. By providing a username "john" and password "' or ''='" the XPath expression now becomes

  4. 4

    This lets user "john" login without a valid password, thus bypassing authentication.

Ejemplo de código vulnerable

Vulnerable Java

The Java code used to retrieve the home directory based on the provided credentials is:

Vulnerable Java
XPath xpath = XPathFactory.newInstance().newXPath();
  XPathExpression xlogin = xpath.compile("//users/user[login/text()='" + login.getUserName() + "' and password/text() = '" + login.getPassword() + "']/home_dir/text()");
  Document d = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance().newDocumentBuilder().parse(new File("db.xml"));
  String homedir = xlogin.evaluate(d);
Payload del atacante

Assume that user "john" wishes to leverage XPath Injection and login without a valid password. By providing a username "john" and password "' or ''='" the XPath expression now becomes

Payload del atacante
//users/user[login/text()='john' or ''='' and password/text() = '' or ''='']/home_dir/text()
Ejemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de prevención

How to prevent CWE-643

  • Implementation Use parameterized XPath queries (e.g. using XQuery). This will help ensure separation between data plane and control plane.
  • Implementation Properly validate user input. Reject data where appropriate, filter where appropriate and escape where appropriate. Make sure input that will be used in XPath queries is safe in that context.
Señales de detección

How to detect CWE-643

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

CWE-643

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Preguntas frecuentes

Frequently asked questions

¿Qué es CWE-643?

XPath Injection occurs when an application uses unvalidated user input to build an XPath query for an XML database. Without proper sanitization, attackers can manipulate the query's structure.

¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-643?

MITRE califica la probabilidad de explotación como Alta — esta debilidad se explota activamente en la práctica y debe priorizarse para su remediación.

¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-643?

MITRE no ha especificado plataformas afectadas para esta CWE — puede aplicar a la mayoría de los stacks de aplicaciones.

¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-643?

Use parameterized XPath queries (e.g. using XQuery). This will help ensure separation between data plane and control plane. Properly validate user input. Reject data where appropriate, filter where appropriate and escape where appropriate. Make sure input that will be used in XPath queries is safe in that context.

¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-643?

El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-643 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.

¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-643?

MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/643.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.

¿Listo para validar lo que importa?

Listo para validar lo que importa.

Plexicus es Proof-Driven AppSec: hallazgos validados, comprensión contextual y remediación revisada — anclada en evidencia, acotada contigo.

Calificación

Comprueba si el AI Swarm Pentest encaja en tu entorno.

Déjanos el contexto mínimo. Revisaremos el alcance y te indicaremos el siguiente paso comercial.

Antes de enviar — verifica que encajas

0 / 280

Sin compromiso. Si no encajas, te lo decimos.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Ronda privada Para inversores