CWE-498 Variante Borrador Medium likelihood

Cloneable Class Containing Sensitive Information

This vulnerability occurs when a class containing sensitive information, such as credentials or personal data, is made cloneable. Attackers can bypass normal initialization and access the sensitive…

Definición

What is CWE-498?

This vulnerability occurs when a class containing sensitive information, such as credentials or personal data, is made cloneable. Attackers can bypass normal initialization and access the sensitive data by creating a copy of the object.
When a class implements the Cloneable interface without proper safeguards, it effectively becomes an open book. The clone() method can create copies of the object without calling its constructor, allowing any other class in the application to duplicate instances and directly access their internal, sensitive fields. This bypasses any security checks or initialization logic you might have placed in the constructor. To prevent this, you should explicitly deny cloning for classes that handle sensitive data. You can achieve this by declaring a clone() method that throws a CloneNotSupportedException. This simple step ensures your object's internal state remains controlled and prevents unintended data exposure through object duplication.
Impacto en el mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-498

Todavía no hay CVEs públicos enlazados a esta CWE en el catálogo de MITRE.

Cómo lo explotan los atacantes

Ruta del atacante paso a paso

  1. 1

    Identifica una ruta de código que maneje entrada no confiable sin validación.

  2. 2

    Crea un payload que ejercite el comportamiento inseguro — inyección, traversal, overflow o abuso de lógica.

  3. 3

    Envía el payload a través de una solicitud normal y observa la reacción de la aplicación.

  4. 4

    Itera hasta que la respuesta filtre datos, ejecute código del atacante o escale privilegios.

Ejemplo de código vulnerable

Vulnerable Java

The following example demonstrates the weakness.

Vulnerable Java
public class CloneClient {
  		public CloneClient() //throws
  		java.lang.CloneNotSupportedException {
  				Teacher t1 = new Teacher("guddu","22,nagar road");
  				//...
  				// Do some stuff to remove the teacher.
  				Teacher t2 = (Teacher)t1.clone();
  				System.out.println(t2.name);
  		}
  		public static void main(String args[]) {
  				new CloneClient();
  		}
  }
  class Teacher implements Cloneable {
  		public Object clone() {
  				try {
  					return super.clone();
  				}
  				catch (java.lang.CloneNotSupportedException e) {
  						throw new RuntimeException(e.toString());
  				}
  		}
  		public String name;
  		public String clas;
  		public Teacher(String name,String clas) {
  				this.name = name;
  				this.clas = clas;
  		}
  }
Ejemplo de código seguro

Secure Java

Make classes uncloneable by defining a clone function like:

Seguro Java
public final void clone() throws java.lang.CloneNotSupportedException {
  	throw new java.lang.CloneNotSupportedException();
  }
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de prevención

How to prevent CWE-498

  • Implementation If you do make your classes clonable, ensure that your clone method is final and throw super.clone().
Señales de detección

How to detect CWE-498

SAST High

Ejecuta análisis estático (SAST) sobre el código buscando el patrón inseguro en el flujo de datos.

DAST Moderate

Ejecuta pruebas dinámicas de seguridad de aplicaciones (DAST) contra el endpoint en vivo.

Runtime Moderate

Vigila los logs en tiempo de ejecución para detectar trazas de excepción inusuales, entradas malformadas o intentos de bypass de autorización.

Code review Moderate

Revisión de código: marca cualquier código nuevo que maneje entrada desde esta superficie sin usar los helpers validados del framework.

CWE-498

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Preguntas frecuentes

Frequently asked questions

¿Qué es CWE-498?

This vulnerability occurs when a class containing sensitive information, such as credentials or personal data, is made cloneable. Attackers can bypass normal initialization and access the sensitive data by creating a copy of the object.

¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-498?

MITRE califica la probabilidad de explotación como Media — la explotación es realista pero suele requerir condiciones específicas.

¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-498?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: C++, Java, C#.

¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-498?

If you do make your classes clonable, ensure that your clone method is final and throw super.clone().

¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-498?

El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-498 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.

¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-498?

MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/498.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.

Debilidades relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-498

CWE-668 Padre

Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere

This vulnerability occurs when an application unintentionally makes a resource accessible to users or systems that should not have…

CWE-1189 Hermano

Improper Isolation of Shared Resources on System-on-a-Chip (SoC)

This vulnerability occurs when a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) fails to properly separate shared hardware resources between secure (trusted) and…

CWE-1282 Hermano

Assumed-Immutable Data is Stored in Writable Memory

This vulnerability occurs when data that should be permanent and unchangeable—like a bootloader, device IDs, or one-time configuration…

CWE-1327 Hermano

Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address

This vulnerability occurs when software or a service is configured to bind to the IP address 0.0.0.0 (or :: in IPv6), which acts as a…

CWE-1331 Hermano

Improper Isolation of Shared Resources in Network On Chip (NoC)

This vulnerability occurs when a Network on Chip (NoC) fails to properly separate its internal, shared resources—like buffers, switches,…

CWE-134 Hermano

Use of Externally-Controlled Format String

This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a format string from an untrusted, external source (like user input, a network packet, or a…

CWE-200 Hermano

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

This weakness occurs when an application unintentionally reveals sensitive data to someone who shouldn't have access to it.

CWE-374 Hermano

Passing Mutable Objects to an Untrusted Method

This vulnerability occurs when a function receives a direct reference to mutable data, such as an object or array, instead of a safe copy…

CWE-375 Hermano

Returning a Mutable Object to an Untrusted Caller

This vulnerability occurs when a method directly returns a reference to its internal mutable data, allowing untrusted calling code to…

¿Listo para validar lo que importa?

Listo para validar lo que importa.

Plexicus es Proof-Driven AppSec: hallazgos validados, comprensión contextual y remediación revisada — anclada en evidencia, acotada contigo.

Calificación

Comprueba si el AI Swarm Pentest encaja en tu entorno.

Déjanos el contexto mínimo. Revisaremos el alcance y te indicaremos el siguiente paso comercial.

Antes de enviar — verifica que encajas

0 / 280

Sin compromiso. Si no encajas, te lo decimos.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Ronda privada Para inversores