CWE-412 Base Incompleto

Unrestricted Externally Accessible Lock

This vulnerability occurs when a system correctly checks for a lock's existence, but an unauthorized external actor can control or influence that lock.

Definición

What is CWE-412?

This vulnerability occurs when a system correctly checks for a lock's existence, but an unauthorized external actor can control or influence that lock.
When an attacker can manipulate a lock—such as a mutex, file lock, or a shared resource used as a lock—they can prevent the application from accessing critical resources or performing essential operations. This effectively creates a denial-of-service condition, as the system remains blocked waiting for a lock it cannot acquire. The severity of this issue escalates if the attacker can hold the lock indefinitely, leading to a permanent disruption of service. Developers must ensure that lock mechanisms are secured within the application's trusted boundary and cannot be created, modified, or sustained by untrusted external sources.
Impacto en el mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-412

  • Program can not execute when attacker obtains a mutex.

  • Program can not execute when attacker obtains a lock on a critical output file.

  • Program can not execute when attacker obtains a lock on a critical output file.

  • Critical file can be opened with exclusive read access by user, preventing application of security policy. Possibly related to improper permissions, large-window race condition.

  • Chain: predictable file names used for locking, allowing attacker to create the lock beforehand. Resultant from permissions and randomness.

  • Chain: Lock files with predictable names. Resultant from randomness.

  • Product does not check if it can write to a log file, allowing attackers to avoid logging by accessing the file using an exclusive lock. Overlaps unchecked error condition. This is not quite CWE-412, but close.

Cómo lo explotan los atacantes

Ruta del atacante paso a paso

  1. 1

    Identifica una ruta de código que maneje entrada no confiable sin validación.

  2. 2

    Crea un payload que ejercite el comportamiento inseguro — inyección, traversal, overflow o abuso de lógica.

  3. 3

    Envía el payload a través de una solicitud normal y observa la reacción de la aplicación.

  4. 4

    Itera hasta que la respuesta filtre datos, ejecute código del atacante o escale privilegios.

Ejemplo de código vulnerable

Vulnerable PHP

This code tries to obtain a lock for a file, then writes to it.

Vulnerable PHP
function writeToLog($message){
  	$logfile = fopen("logFile.log", "a");
```
//attempt to get logfile lock* 
  	if (flock($logfile, LOCK_EX)) {
  	```
  		fwrite($logfile,$message);
```
// unlock logfile* 
  		flock($logfile, LOCK_UN);}
  	else {
  	```
  		print "Could not obtain lock on logFile.log, message not recorded\n";
  	}
  }
  fclose($logFile);
Ejemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de prevención

How to prevent CWE-412

  • Architecture and Design / Implementation Use any access control that is offered by the functionality that is offering the lock.
  • Architecture and Design / Implementation Use unpredictable names or identifiers for the locks. This might not always be possible or feasible.
  • Architecture and Design Consider modifying your code to use non-blocking synchronization methods.
Señales de detección

How to detect CWE-412

White Box

Automated code analysis techniques might not be able to reliably detect this weakness, since the application's behavior and general security model dictate which resource locks are critical. Interpretation of the weakness might require knowledge of the environment, e.g. if the existence of a file is used as a lock, but the file is created in a world-writable directory.

CWE-412

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Preguntas frecuentes

Frequently asked questions

¿Qué es CWE-412?

This vulnerability occurs when a system correctly checks for a lock's existence, but an unauthorized external actor can control or influence that lock.

¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-412?

MITRE no ha publicado una calificación de probabilidad de explotación para esta debilidad. Trátala como de impacto medio hasta que tu modelo de amenazas demuestre lo contrario.

¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-412?

MITRE no ha especificado plataformas afectadas para esta CWE — puede aplicar a la mayoría de los stacks de aplicaciones.

¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-412?

Use any access control that is offered by the functionality that is offering the lock. Use unpredictable names or identifiers for the locks. This might not always be possible or feasible.

¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-412?

El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-412 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.

¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-412?

MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/412.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.

Debilidades relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-412

CWE-667 Padre

Improper Locking

This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to correctly acquire or release a lock on a shared resource, such as a file, database…

CWE-1232 Hermano

Improper Lock Behavior After Power State Transition

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware lock bit, designed to protect critical system configuration registers, is improperly reset or…

CWE-1233 Hermano

Security-Sensitive Hardware Controls with Missing Lock Bit Protection

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware device uses a lock bit to protect critical configuration registers, but the lock fails to…

CWE-1234 Hermano

Hardware Internal or Debug Modes Allow Override of Locks

Hardware debug modes or internal states can bypass critical system lock protections, allowing unauthorized changes to device configuration.

CWE-413 Hermano

Improper Resource Locking

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly lock a shared resource, such as a file or memory location, before…

CWE-414 Hermano

Missing Lock Check

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to verify that a proper synchronization lock is active before accessing or modifying a…

CWE-609 Hermano

Double-Checked Locking

Double-checked locking is an insufficient synchronization pattern where a program checks a resource's state, acquires a lock, and checks…

CWE-764 Hermano

Multiple Locks of a Critical Resource

This vulnerability occurs when a critical resource, such as a file, data structure, or connection, is locked more times than the software…

CWE-765 Hermano

Multiple Unlocks of a Critical Resource

This vulnerability occurs when a critical resource, like a lock or semaphore, is unlocked more times than it was locked, putting the…

¿Listo para validar lo que importa?

Listo para validar lo que importa.

Plexicus es Proof-Driven AppSec: hallazgos validados, comprensión contextual y remediación revisada — anclada en evidencia, acotada contigo.

Calificación

Comprueba si el AI Swarm Pentest encaja en tu entorno.

Déjanos el contexto mínimo. Revisaremos el alcance y te indicaremos el siguiente paso comercial.

Antes de enviar — verifica que encajas

0 / 280

Sin compromiso. Si no encajas, te lo decimos.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Ronda privada Para inversores