CWE-331 Base Borrador

Insufficient Entropy

This vulnerability occurs when a system's random number generator or algorithm lacks sufficient unpredictability, creating patterns or predictable outputs that are easier for attackers to guess.

Definición

What is CWE-331?

This vulnerability occurs when a system's random number generator or algorithm lacks sufficient unpredictability, creating patterns or predictable outputs that are easier for attackers to guess.
Insufficient entropy means your random values aren't random enough. This often stems from using weak algorithms (like `rand()`), seeding generators with predictable values (like the current time), or drawing from a source with limited possible outcomes. Attackers can exploit these patterns to predict security-critical values like session tokens, cryptographic keys, or password reset codes, effectively bypassing protections that rely on randomness. To prevent this, developers should use cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generators (CSPRNGs) provided by the operating system or language's security libraries. Always ensure your entropy source is robust and unpredictable, especially for initialization vectors, nonces, and key generation. For high-stakes systems, consider using hardware random number generators or dedicated security services to guarantee the quality of your randomness.
Impacto en el mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-331

  • Insufficiently random data used to generate session tokens using C rand(). Also, for certificate/key generation, uses a source that does not block when entropy is low.

  • Chain: insufficient precision (CWE-1339) in random-number generator causes some zero bits to be reliably generated, reducing the amount of entropy (CWE-331)

Cómo lo explotan los atacantes

Ruta del atacante paso a paso

  1. 1

    This code generates a unique random identifier for a user's session.

  2. 2

    Because the seed for the PRNG is always the user's ID, the session ID will always be the same. An attacker could thus predict any user's session ID and potentially hijack the session.

  3. 3

    This example also exhibits a Small Seed Space (CWE-339).

  4. 4

    The following code uses a statistical PRNG to create a URL for a receipt that remains active for some period of time after a purchase.

  5. 5

    This code uses the Random.nextInt() function to generate "unique" identifiers for the receipt pages it generates. Because Random.nextInt() is a statistical PRNG, it is easy for an attacker to guess the strings it generates. Although the underlying design of the receipt system is also faulty, it would be more secure if it used a random number generator that did not produce predictable receipt identifiers, such as a cryptographic PRNG.

Ejemplo de código vulnerable

Vulnerable PHP

This code generates a unique random identifier for a user's session.

Vulnerable PHP
function generateSessionID($userID){
  	srand($userID);
  	return rand();
  }
Ejemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de prevención

How to prevent CWE-331

  • Implementation Determine the necessary entropy to adequately provide for randomness and predictability. This can be achieved by increasing the number of bits of objects such as keys and seeds.
Señales de detección

How to detect CWE-331

SAST High

Ejecuta análisis estático (SAST) sobre el código buscando el patrón inseguro en el flujo de datos.

DAST Moderate

Ejecuta pruebas dinámicas de seguridad de aplicaciones (DAST) contra el endpoint en vivo.

Runtime Moderate

Vigila los logs en tiempo de ejecución para detectar trazas de excepción inusuales, entradas malformadas o intentos de bypass de autorización.

Code review Moderate

Revisión de código: marca cualquier código nuevo que maneje entrada desde esta superficie sin usar los helpers validados del framework.

CWE-331

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Preguntas frecuentes

Frequently asked questions

¿Qué es CWE-331?

This vulnerability occurs when a system's random number generator or algorithm lacks sufficient unpredictability, creating patterns or predictable outputs that are easier for attackers to guess.

¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-331?

MITRE no ha publicado una calificación de probabilidad de explotación para esta debilidad. Trátala como de impacto medio hasta que tu modelo de amenazas demuestre lo contrario.

¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-331?

MITRE no ha especificado plataformas afectadas para esta CWE — puede aplicar a la mayoría de los stacks de aplicaciones.

¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-331?

Determine the necessary entropy to adequately provide for randomness and predictability. This can be achieved by increasing the number of bits of objects such as keys and seeds.

¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-331?

El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-331 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.

¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-331?

MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/331.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.

Debilidades relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-331

CWE-330 Padre

Use of Insufficiently Random Values

This vulnerability occurs when an application uses random values that are not sufficiently unpredictable in security-sensitive operations,…

CWE-1204 Hermano

Generation of Weak Initialization Vector (IV)

This vulnerability occurs when software uses a weak or predictable Initialization Vector (IV) for cryptographic operations. Many…

CWE-1241 Hermano

Use of Predictable Algorithm in Random Number Generator

This vulnerability occurs when a device or application relies on a predictable algorithm to generate pseudo-random numbers, making the…

CWE-334 Hermano

Small Space of Random Values

This vulnerability occurs when a system uses a random number generator that produces too few possible values. Attackers can easily predict…

CWE-335 Hermano

Incorrect Usage of Seeds in Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG)

This vulnerability occurs when a Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG) is used, but its initial seed value is not handled securely or…

CWE-338 Hermano

Use of Cryptographically Weak Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG)

This vulnerability occurs when software uses a pseudo-random number generator (PRNG) that is not cryptographically strong for…

CWE-340 Hermano

Generation of Predictable Numbers or Identifiers

This vulnerability occurs when a system creates numbers or identifiers that are too easy to guess, undermining security mechanisms that…

CWE-344 Hermano

Use of Invariant Value in Dynamically Changing Context

This vulnerability occurs when code uses a fixed, unchanging value (like a hardcoded string, number, or reference) in a situation where…

CWE-332 Hijo

Insufficient Entropy in PRNG

This vulnerability occurs when a Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG) doesn't have enough randomness (entropy) to start with, or isn't…

¿Listo para validar lo que importa?

Listo para validar lo que importa.

Plexicus es Proof-Driven AppSec: hallazgos validados, comprensión contextual y remediación revisada — anclada en evidencia, acotada contigo.

Calificación

Comprueba si el AI Swarm Pentest encaja en tu entorno.

Déjanos el contexto mínimo. Revisaremos el alcance y te indicaremos el siguiente paso comercial.

Antes de enviar — verifica que encajas

0 / 280

Sin compromiso. Si no encajas, te lo decimos.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Ronda privada Para inversores