CWE-256 Base Incompleto High likelihood

Plaintext Storage of a Password

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores user passwords as readable text instead of using secure, one-way hashing. This insecure practice exposes credentials in memory, files, or…

Definición

What is CWE-256?

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores user passwords as readable text instead of using secure, one-way hashing. This insecure practice exposes credentials in memory, files, or databases where attackers can easily retrieve them.
Storing passwords in plaintext is a critical security failure because it completely bypasses the fundamental purpose of password protection. If an attacker gains access to the storage—through a database breach, a leaked file, or a memory dump—they immediately obtain all user credentials. This often leads to account takeover, data theft, and lateral movement across systems, as users frequently reuse passwords. To prevent this, developers must never store the actual password. Instead, always use a strong, adaptive cryptographic hash function (like Argon2, scrypt, or bcrypt) with a unique salt for each password. This transforms the password into a fixed-length, irreversible string. Even if the hash is exposed, the original password remains computationally infeasible to recover, significantly limiting the damage of a data breach.
Vulnerability Diagram CWE-256
Plaintext Storage of Password User signs up pw="hunter2" users table name | password alice | hunter2 bob | letmein eve | qwerty DB dump → all passwords credential stuffing Passwords must be salted+hashed (bcrypt/argon2), never stored plain.
Impacto en el mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-256

  • Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) uses a driver that relies on a password stored in plaintext.

Cómo lo explotan los atacantes

Ruta del atacante paso a paso

  1. 1

    The following code reads a password from a properties file and uses the password to connect to a database.

  2. 2

    This code will run successfully, but anyone who has access to config.properties can read the value of password. If a devious employee has access to this information, they can use it to break into the system.

  3. 3

    The following code reads a password from the registry and uses the password to create a new network credential.

  4. 4

    This code will run successfully, but anyone who has access to the registry key used to store the password can read the value of password. If a devious employee has access to this information, they can use it to break into the system

  5. 5

    The following examples show a portion of properties and configuration files for Java and ASP.NET applications. The files include username and password information but they are stored in cleartext.

Ejemplo de código vulnerable

Vulnerable Java

The following code reads a password from a properties file and uses the password to connect to a database.

Vulnerable Java
...
  Properties prop = new Properties();
  prop.load(new FileInputStream("config.properties"));
  String password = prop.getProperty("password");
  DriverManager.getConnection(url, usr, password);
  ...
Ejemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de prevención

How to prevent CWE-256

  • Architecture and Design Avoid storing passwords in easily accessible locations.
  • Architecture and Design Consider storing cryptographic hashes of passwords as an alternative to storing in plaintext.
  • A programmer might attempt to remedy the password management problem by obscuring the password with an encoding function, such as base 64 encoding, but this effort does not adequately protect the password because the encoding can be detected and decoded easily.
Señales de detección

How to detect CWE-256

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

CWE-256

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Preguntas frecuentes

Frequently asked questions

¿Qué es CWE-256?

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores user passwords as readable text instead of using secure, one-way hashing. This insecure practice exposes credentials in memory, files, or databases where attackers can easily retrieve them.

¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-256?

MITRE califica la probabilidad de explotación como Alta — esta debilidad se explota activamente en la práctica y debe priorizarse para su remediación.

¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-256?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: ICS/OT.

¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-256?

Avoid storing passwords in easily accessible locations. Consider storing cryptographic hashes of passwords as an alternative to storing in plaintext.

¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-256?

El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-256 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.

¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-256?

MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/256.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.

¿Listo para validar lo que importa?

Listo para validar lo que importa.

Plexicus es Proof-Driven AppSec: hallazgos validados, comprensión contextual y remediación revisada — anclada en evidencia, acotada contigo.

Calificación

Comprueba si el AI Swarm Pentest encaja en tu entorno.

Déjanos el contexto mínimo. Revisaremos el alcance y te indicaremos el siguiente paso comercial.

Antes de enviar — verifica que encajas

0 / 280

Sin compromiso. Si no encajas, te lo decimos.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Ronda privada Para inversores