CWE-1245 Base Incompleto

Improper Finite State Machines (FSMs) in Hardware Logic

This vulnerability occurs when hardware logic contains flawed Finite State Machines (FSMs). Attackers can exploit these design errors to force the system into an undefined or unstable condition,…

Definición

What is CWE-1245?

This vulnerability occurs when hardware logic contains flawed Finite State Machines (FSMs). Attackers can exploit these design errors to force the system into an undefined or unstable condition, potentially leading to a denial of service (DoS) or allowing privilege escalation.
Finite State Machines are critical for managing a system's security posture and operational flow. They often control access to sensitive data and govern secure operations. If an FSM is poorly designed—for example, by leaving states undefined or incorrectly implementing transitions—an attacker can manipulate it into a deadlock or unrecoverable error state. This typically crashes the affected component or requires a full system reset to restore functionality, resulting in a denial of service. The security impact escalates when FSMs are used to enforce privilege levels or authorization checks. By driving the FSM into an unintended state, an attacker might bypass security gates, gain elevated privileges, or corrupt secure data transfers. This initial compromise can then serve as a foothold to launch further attacks, ultimately undermining the hardware's intended security guarantees.
Impacto en el mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1245

Todavía no hay CVEs públicos enlazados a esta CWE en el catálogo de MITRE.

Cómo lo explotan los atacantes

Ruta del atacante paso a paso

  1. 1

    Identifica una ruta de código que maneje entrada no confiable sin validación.

  2. 2

    Crea un payload que ejercite el comportamiento inseguro — inyección, traversal, overflow o abuso de lógica.

  3. 3

    Envía el payload a través de una solicitud normal y observa la reacción de la aplicación.

  4. 4

    Itera hasta que la respuesta filtre datos, ejecute código del atacante o escale privilegios.

Ejemplo de código vulnerable

Vulnerable Verilog

The Finite State Machine (FSM) shown in the "bad" code snippet below assigns the output ("out") based on the value of state, which is determined based on the user provided input ("user_input").

Vulnerable Verilog
module fsm_1(out, user_input, clk, rst_n); 
  input [2:0] user_input; 
  input clk, rst_n; 
  output reg [2:0] out; 
  reg [1:0] state; 
  always @ (posedge clk or negedge rst_n ) 
  	begin 
  		 if (!rst_n)
  			 state = 3'h0; 
  		 else
  		 case (user_input) 
  			 3'h0:
  			 3'h1:
  			 3'h2:
  			 3'h3: state = 2'h3;
  			 3'h4: state = 2'h2;
  			 3'h5: state = 2'h1;
  		 endcase 
  	 end
  	 out <= {1'h1, state};
   endmodule
Ejemplo de código seguro

Secure Verilog

The case statement does not include a default to handle the scenario when the user provides inputs of 3'h6 and 3'h7. Those inputs push the system to an undefined state and might cause a crash (denial of service) or any other unanticipated outcome. Adding a default statement to handle undefined inputs mitigates this issue. This is shown in the "Good" code snippet below. The default statement is in bold.

Seguro Verilog
case (user_input) 
  	3'h0: 
  	3'h1: 
  	3'h2: 
  	3'h3: state = 2'h3; 
  	3'h4: state = 2'h2; 
  	3'h5: state = 2'h1; 
```
default: state = 2'h0;**  endcase
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de prevención

How to prevent CWE-1245

  • Architecture and Design / Implementation Define all possible states and handle all unused states through default statements. Ensure that system defaults to a secure state.
Señales de detección

How to detect CWE-1245

SAST High

Ejecuta análisis estático (SAST) sobre el código buscando el patrón inseguro en el flujo de datos.

DAST Moderate

Ejecuta pruebas dinámicas de seguridad de aplicaciones (DAST) contra el endpoint en vivo.

Runtime Moderate

Vigila los logs en tiempo de ejecución para detectar trazas de excepción inusuales, entradas malformadas o intentos de bypass de autorización.

Code review Moderate

Revisión de código: marca cualquier código nuevo que maneje entrada desde esta superficie sin usar los helpers validados del framework.

CWE-1245

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Preguntas frecuentes

Frequently asked questions

¿Qué es CWE-1245?

This vulnerability occurs when hardware logic contains flawed Finite State Machines (FSMs). Attackers can exploit these design errors to force the system into an undefined or unstable condition, potentially leading to a denial of service (DoS) or allowing privilege escalation.

¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-1245?

MITRE no ha publicado una calificación de probabilidad de explotación para esta debilidad. Trátala como de impacto medio hasta que tu modelo de amenazas demuestre lo contrario.

¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-1245?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, System on Chip.

¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-1245?

Define all possible states and handle all unused states through default statements. Ensure that system defaults to a secure state.

¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-1245?

El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-1245 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.

¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-1245?

MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1245.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.

¿Listo para validar lo que importa?

Listo para validar lo que importa.

Plexicus es Proof-Driven AppSec: hallazgos validados, comprensión contextual y remediación revisada — anclada en evidencia, acotada contigo.

Calificación

Comprueba si el AI Swarm Pentest encaja en tu entorno.

Déjanos el contexto mínimo. Revisaremos el alcance y te indicaremos el siguiente paso comercial.

Antes de enviar — verifica que encajas

0 / 280

Sin compromiso. Si no encajas, te lo decimos.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Ronda privada Para inversores