CWE-646 Variante Incomplet High likelihood

Reliance on File Name or Extension of Externally-Supplied File

This vulnerability occurs when an application uses the name or extension of an uploaded file to decide how to handle it. Attackers can manipulate this by uploading files with deceptive names,…

Définition

What is CWE-646?

This vulnerability occurs when an application uses the name or extension of an uploaded file to decide how to handle it. Attackers can manipulate this by uploading files with deceptive names, causing the application to process them incorrectly and potentially dangerously.
Applications often inspect a file's name or extension to determine the next steps—like which interpreter to use, what data to display, or which resources to allocate. If an attacker uploads a file with a misleading name (e.g., 'malicious.php.gif'), the system might misclassify it and execute it as code instead of treating it as a simple image. This misclassification can lead directly to severe consequences, including remote code execution, denial of service, or unauthorized exposure of sensitive system or application data. This security flaw can stem from multiple sources: a weakness in the web server software itself, an insecure application configuration, or a separate bug in the application's logic. The core issue is trusting unvalidated, user-controlled input (the filename) to make critical security decisions. To prevent this, applications must never rely solely on file names or extensions; instead, they should use positive server-side validation of the file's actual content and type.
Impact réel

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-646

Aucune référence CVE publique n'est liée à ce CWE dans le catalogue MITRE pour le moment.

Comment les attaquants l'exploitent

Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape

  1. 1

    Identifier un chemin de code qui traite des entrées non fiables sans validation.

  2. 2

    Élaborer une charge utile qui exploite le comportement non sécurisé — injection, traversal, débordement ou abus de logique.

  3. 3

    Délivrer la charge utile via une requête normale et observer la réaction de l'application.

  4. 4

    Itérer jusqu'à ce que la réponse divulgue des données, exécute le code de l'attaquant ou élève les privilèges.

Exemple de code vulnérable

Vulnerable pseudo

MITRE n'a pas publié d'exemple de code pour ce CWE. Le motif ci-dessous est illustratif — voir Ressources pour les références canoniques.

Vulnérable pseudo
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
  // Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
  return executeUnsafe(input);
}
Exemple de code sécurisé

Secure pseudo

Sécurisé pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Liste de contrôle de prévention

How to prevent CWE-646

  • Architecture and Design Make decisions on the server side based on file content and not on file name or extension.
Signaux de détection

How to detect CWE-646

SAST High

Exécuter une analyse statique (SAST) sur le code source à la recherche du motif non sécurisé dans le flux de données.

DAST Moderate

Exécuter des tests de sécurité applicative dynamique (DAST) contre le point de terminaison en ligne.

Runtime Moderate

Surveiller les journaux runtime pour détecter des traces d'exception inhabituelles, des entrées malformées ou des tentatives de contournement d'autorisation.

Code review Moderate

Revue de code : signaler tout nouveau code qui traite les entrées de cette surface sans utiliser les helpers du framework validés.

CWE-646

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Questions fréquentes

Frequently asked questions

Qu'est-ce que CWE-646 ?

This vulnerability occurs when an application uses the name or extension of an uploaded file to decide how to handle it. Attackers can manipulate this by uploading files with deceptive names, causing the application to process them incorrectly and potentially dangerously.

Quelle est la gravité de CWE-646 ?

MITRE évalue la probabilité d'exploitation comme Élevée — cette faiblesse est activement exploitée et doit être priorisée pour la remédiation.

Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-646 ?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Web Server.

Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-646 ?

Make decisions on the server side based on file content and not on file name or extension.

Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-646 ?

Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-646 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.

Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-646 ?

MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/646.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.

Faiblesses associées

Weaknesses related to CWE-646

CWE-345 Parent

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly check where data comes from or confirm its legitimacy, allowing untrusted…

CWE-1293 Frère

Missing Source Correlation of Multiple Independent Data

This vulnerability occurs when a system trusts a single source of data without verification, making it impossible to detect if that source…

CWE-346 Frère

Origin Validation Error

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly confirm the true origin of incoming data or communication, allowing…

CWE-347 Frère

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly check the digital signature on data, or skips the verification step…

CWE-348 Frère

Use of Less Trusted Source

This vulnerability occurs when a system has access to multiple sources for the same critical data, but it chooses to rely on the less…

CWE-349 Frère

Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data

This vulnerability occurs when a system processes both trusted and untrusted data together, but fails to separate them. The application…

CWE-351 Frère

Insufficient Type Distinction

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly differentiate between different types of data or objects, leading to…

CWE-352 Frère

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) happens when a web application cannot reliably tell if a user actually intended to submit a request,…

CWE-353 Frère

Missing Support for Integrity Check

This vulnerability occurs when a system uses a communication protocol that lacks built-in integrity verification, such as a checksum or…

Prêt à valider l'essentiel ?

Prêt à valider ce qui compte.

Plexicus est Proof-Driven AppSec : findings validés, compréhension contextuelle et remédiation relue — ancrée dans la preuve, scopée avec vous.

Qualification

Vérifiez si l'AI Swarm Pentest convient à votre environnement.

Partagez le contexte minimum. Nous vérifierons le périmètre et indiquerons la prochaine étape commerciale.

Avant d'envoyer — vérifiez que vous correspondez

0 / 280

Sans engagement. Si vous ne correspondez pas, nous vous le dirons.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Tour privé Pour les investisseurs