CWE-643 Base Incomplet High likelihood

Improper Neutralization of Data within XPath Expressions ('XPath Injection')

XPath Injection occurs when an application uses unvalidated user input to build an XPath query for an XML database. Without proper sanitization, attackers can manipulate the query's structure.

Définition

What is CWE-643?

XPath Injection occurs when an application uses unvalidated user input to build an XPath query for an XML database. Without proper sanitization, attackers can manipulate the query's structure.
This vulnerability allows an attacker to alter the intended logic of the XPath expression. By injecting special characters or control sequences, they can change which data is retrieved from the XML source, potentially bypassing application logic, authentication, or access controls. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized data exposure, information disclosure, or manipulation of application flow. Developers must treat all user input used in XPath queries as untrusted and implement proper validation or parameterization to prevent these attacks.
Impact réel

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-643

Aucune référence CVE publique n'est liée à ce CWE dans le catalogue MITRE pour le moment.

Comment les attaquants l'exploitent

Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape

  1. 1

    Consider the following simple XML document that stores authentication information and a snippet of Java code that uses XPath query to retrieve authentication information:

  2. 2

    The Java code used to retrieve the home directory based on the provided credentials is:

  3. 3

    Assume that user "john" wishes to leverage XPath Injection and login without a valid password. By providing a username "john" and password "' or ''='" the XPath expression now becomes

  4. 4

    This lets user "john" login without a valid password, thus bypassing authentication.

Exemple de code vulnérable

Vulnerable Java

The Java code used to retrieve the home directory based on the provided credentials is:

Vulnérable Java
XPath xpath = XPathFactory.newInstance().newXPath();
  XPathExpression xlogin = xpath.compile("//users/user[login/text()='" + login.getUserName() + "' and password/text() = '" + login.getPassword() + "']/home_dir/text()");
  Document d = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance().newDocumentBuilder().parse(new File("db.xml"));
  String homedir = xlogin.evaluate(d);
Charge utile de l'attaquant

Assume that user "john" wishes to leverage XPath Injection and login without a valid password. By providing a username "john" and password "' or ''='" the XPath expression now becomes

Charge utile de l'attaquant
//users/user[login/text()='john' or ''='' and password/text() = '' or ''='']/home_dir/text()
Exemple de code sécurisé

Secure pseudo

Sécurisé pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Liste de contrôle de prévention

How to prevent CWE-643

  • Implementation Use parameterized XPath queries (e.g. using XQuery). This will help ensure separation between data plane and control plane.
  • Implementation Properly validate user input. Reject data where appropriate, filter where appropriate and escape where appropriate. Make sure input that will be used in XPath queries is safe in that context.
Signaux de détection

How to detect CWE-643

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

CWE-643

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Questions fréquentes

Frequently asked questions

Qu'est-ce que CWE-643 ?

XPath Injection occurs when an application uses unvalidated user input to build an XPath query for an XML database. Without proper sanitization, attackers can manipulate the query's structure.

Quelle est la gravité de CWE-643 ?

MITRE évalue la probabilité d'exploitation comme Élevée — cette faiblesse est activement exploitée et doit être priorisée pour la remédiation.

Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-643 ?

MITRE n'a pas spécifié les plateformes affectées pour ce CWE — il peut s'appliquer à la plupart des stacks applicatives.

Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-643 ?

Use parameterized XPath queries (e.g. using XQuery). This will help ensure separation between data plane and control plane. Properly validate user input. Reject data where appropriate, filter where appropriate and escape where appropriate. Make sure input that will be used in XPath queries is safe in that context.

Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-643 ?

Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-643 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.

Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-643 ?

MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/643.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.

Prêt à valider l'essentiel ?

Prêt à valider ce qui compte.

Plexicus est Proof-Driven AppSec : findings validés, compréhension contextuelle et remédiation relue — ancrée dans la preuve, scopée avec vous.

Qualification

Vérifiez si l'AI Swarm Pentest convient à votre environnement.

Partagez le contexte minimum. Nous vérifierons le périmètre et indiquerons la prochaine étape commerciale.

Avant d'envoyer — vérifiez que vous correspondez

0 / 280

Sans engagement. Si vous ne correspondez pas, nous vous le dirons.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Tour privé Pour les investisseurs