Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
CWE-617 Base Brouillon
Reachable Assertion
A reachable assertion occurs when an attacker can trigger an assert() statement or similar debugging check, causing the application to crash or behave in a more disruptive way than intended. This…
Définition
What is CWE-617?
A reachable assertion occurs when an attacker can trigger an assert() statement or similar debugging check, causing the application to crash or behave in a more disruptive way than intended. This turns a helpful development tool into a denial-of-service vulnerability.
Assertions are meant to catch logic errors during development, but if left in production code, they can be weaponized. An attacker who discovers the trigger condition can force the application to exit abruptly, disrupting service for all users. For instance, a single triggered assert() in a multi-connection server could terminate every active connection, causing widespread outage.
While SAST tools can flag the presence of assertions, managing this risk at scale across a large codebase is challenging. An ASPM platform like Plexicus helps by continuously tracking these flaws in production, and its AI can recommend specific fixes—such as replacing the assert with proper error handling—saving significant manual remediation time.
Impact réel
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-617
-
Chain: function in web caching proxy does not correctly check a return value (CWE-253) leading to a reachable assertion (CWE-617)
-
FTP server allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon abort) via crafted commands which trigger an assertion failure.
-
Chat client allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long message string when connecting to a server, which causes an assertion failure.
-
Product allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via LDAP BIND requests with long authcid names, which triggers an assertion failure.
-
Product allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via certain queries, which cause an assertion failure.
-
Chain: security monitoring product has an off-by-one error that leads to unexpected length values, triggering an assertion.
-
Anti-virus product has assert error when line length is non-numeric.
Comment les attaquants l'exploitent
Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape
- 1
Identifier un chemin de code qui traite des entrées non fiables sans validation.
- 2
Élaborer une charge utile qui exploite le comportement non sécurisé — injection, traversal, débordement ou abus de logique.
- 3
Délivrer la charge utile via une requête normale et observer la réaction de l'application.
- 4
Itérer jusqu'à ce que la réponse divulgue des données, exécute le code de l'attaquant ou élève les privilèges.
Exemple de code vulnérable
Vulnerable Java
In the excerpt below, an AssertionError (an unchecked exception) is thrown if the user hasn't entered an email address in an HTML form.
String email = request.getParameter("email_address");
assert email != null; Exemple de code sécurisé
Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Liste de contrôle de prévention
How to prevent CWE-617
- Implementation Make sensitive open/close operation non reachable by directly user-controlled data (e.g. open/close resources)
- Implementation Perform input validation on user data.
Signaux de détection
How to detect CWE-617
CWE-617
Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.
Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.
Questions fréquentes Qu'est-ce que CWE-617 ?
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-617 ?
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-617 ?
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-617 ?
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-617 ?
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-617 ?
Frequently asked questions
Qu'est-ce que CWE-617 ?
A reachable assertion occurs when an attacker can trigger an assert() statement or similar debugging check, causing the application to crash or behave in a more disruptive way than intended. This turns a helpful development tool into a denial-of-service vulnerability.
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-617 ?
MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-617 ?
MITRE n'a pas spécifié les plateformes affectées pour ce CWE — il peut s'appliquer à la plupart des stacks applicatives.
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-617 ?
Make sensitive open/close operation non reachable by directly user-controlled data (e.g. open/close resources) Perform input validation on user data.
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-617 ?
Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-617 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-617 ?
MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/617.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.
Faiblesses associées
Weaknesses related to CWE-617
CWE-670 Parent
Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
This weakness occurs when a section of code is structured in a way that always executes incorrectly, regardless of input or conditions.…
CWE-480 Frère
Use of Incorrect Operator
This vulnerability occurs when a developer mistakenly uses the wrong operator in their code, leading to unintended and potentially…
CWE-483 Frère
Incorrect Block Delimitation
This vulnerability occurs when a developer fails to use explicit braces or delimiters to group multiple statements within a block, leading…
CWE-484 Frère
Omitted Break Statement in Switch
This vulnerability occurs when a developer forgets to include a 'break' statement inside a switch-case block. Without it, the code…
CWE-698 Frère
Execution After Redirect (EAR)
Execution After Redirect (EAR) occurs when a web application sends a redirect response to a user's browser but continues to run…
CWE-783 Frère
Operator Precedence Logic Error
This vulnerability occurs when a developer writes a conditional expression where the intended logic is broken due to misunderstanding or…
Prêt à valider l'essentiel ?
Prêt à valider ce qui compte.
Plexicus est Proof-Driven AppSec : findings validés, compréhension contextuelle et remédiation relue — ancrée dans la preuve, scopée avec vous.