CWE-611 Base Brouillon

Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference

This vulnerability occurs when an application processes XML input without properly restricting external entity references. Attackers can exploit this to read local files, trigger internal network…

Définition

What is CWE-611?

This vulnerability occurs when an application processes XML input without properly restricting external entity references. Attackers can exploit this to read local files, trigger internal network requests, or cause denial of service.
XML parsers often support Document Type Definitions (DTDs), which can define custom entities. When these entities point to external URIs (like file://, http://), the parser may fetch and include that external content. An attacker can inject a malicious DTD that references sensitive system files (e.g., /etc/passwd, C:\Windows\win.ini) or internal endpoints, leading to data exposure or server-side request forgery (SSRF). The retrieved data is often reflected in the application's output, such as error messages or API responses. Preventing XXE requires disabling DTD processing entirely or securely configuring the XML parser to reject external entities. Since manual code reviews and traditional SAST tools can miss parser configurations, managing this at scale is difficult; an ASPM like Plexicus can help you track and remediate these flaws across your entire stack by correlating findings with actual runtime behavior and suggesting prioritized fixes.
Impact réel

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-611

  • Recruiter software allows reading arbitrary files using XXE

  • A browser control can allow remote attackers to determine the existence of files via Javascript containing XML script.

  • XXE during SVG image conversion

  • XXE in PHP application allows reading the application's configuration file.

  • XXE in database server

  • XXE in rapid web application development framework allows reading arbitrary files.

  • XXE via XML-RPC request.

  • XXE in office document product using RDF.

Comment les attaquants l'exploitent

Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape

  1. 1

    Identifier un chemin de code qui traite des entrées non fiables sans validation.

  2. 2

    Élaborer une charge utile qui exploite le comportement non sécurisé — injection, traversal, débordement ou abus de logique.

  3. 3

    Délivrer la charge utile via une requête normale et observer la réaction de l'application.

  4. 4

    Itérer jusqu'à ce que la réponse divulgue des données, exécute le code de l'attaquant ou élève les privilèges.

Exemple de code vulnérable

Vulnerable pseudo

MITRE n'a pas publié d'exemple de code pour ce CWE. Le motif ci-dessous est illustratif — voir Ressources pour les références canoniques.

Vulnérable pseudo
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
  // Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
  return executeUnsafe(input);
}
Exemple de code sécurisé

Secure pseudo

Sécurisé pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Liste de contrôle de prévention

How to prevent CWE-611

  • Implementation / System Configuration Many XML parsers and validators can be configured to disable external entity expansion.
Signaux de détection

How to detect CWE-611

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

CWE-611

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Questions fréquentes

Frequently asked questions

Qu'est-ce que CWE-611 ?

This vulnerability occurs when an application processes XML input without properly restricting external entity references. Attackers can exploit this to read local files, trigger internal network requests, or cause denial of service.

Quelle est la gravité de CWE-611 ?

MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.

Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-611 ?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: XML, Web Based.

Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-611 ?

Many XML parsers and validators can be configured to disable external entity expansion.

Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-611 ?

Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-611 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.

Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-611 ?

MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/611.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.

Faiblesses associées

Weaknesses related to CWE-611

CWE-610 Parent

Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere

This vulnerability occurs when an application uses user-supplied input to reference a resource located outside its intended security…

CWE-1021 Frère

Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames

This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly control whether its pages can be embedded within frames or UI layers…

CWE-15 Frère

External Control of System or Configuration Setting

This vulnerability occurs when an application allows users to directly modify critical system settings or configuration values from an…

CWE-384 Frère

Session Fixation

Session fixation occurs when an application authenticates a user without first destroying the previous session ID. This allows an attacker…

CWE-441 Frère

Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')

A confused deputy vulnerability occurs when a system receives a request from a client and forwards it to an external destination without…

CWE-470 Frère

Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection')

This vulnerability occurs when an application uses unvalidated external input, like a URL parameter or form field, to dynamically decide…

CWE-601 Frère

URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')

An open redirect vulnerability occurs when a web application uses unvalidated user input to determine the destination of a redirect,…

CWE-73 Frère

External Control of File Name or Path

This vulnerability occurs when an application uses unvalidated user input to construct file or directory paths for filesystem operations.

CWE-918 Frère

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) occurs when a web application fetches a remote resource based on user-controlled input, but fails to…

Prêt à valider l'essentiel ?

Prêt à valider ce qui compte.

Plexicus est Proof-Driven AppSec : findings validés, compréhension contextuelle et remédiation relue — ancrée dans la preuve, scopée avec vous.

Qualification

Vérifiez si l'AI Swarm Pentest convient à votre environnement.

Partagez le contexte minimum. Nous vérifierons le périmètre et indiquerons la prochaine étape commerciale.

Avant d'envoyer — vérifiez que vous correspondez

0 / 280

Sans engagement. Si vous ne correspondez pas, nous vous le dirons.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Tour privé Pour les investisseurs