Exécuter une analyse statique (SAST) sur le code source à la recherche du motif non sécurisé dans le flux de données.
Authentication Bypass by Spoofing
This weakness occurs when an application's authentication system can be tricked into accepting forged or manipulated credentials, allowing unauthorized access without proper verification.
What is CWE-290?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-290
-
S-bus functionality in a home automation product performs access control using an IP allowlist, which can be bypassed by a forged IP address.
-
VOIP product allows authentication bypass using 127.0.0.1 in the Host header.
Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape
- 1
The following code authenticates users.
- 2
The authentication mechanism implemented relies on an IP address for source validation. If an attacker is able to spoof the IP, they may be able to bypass the authentication mechanism.
- 3
Both of these examples check if a request is from a trusted address before responding to the request.
- 4
The code only verifies the address as stored in the request packet. An attacker can spoof this address, thus impersonating a trusted client.
- 5
The following code samples use a DNS lookup in order to decide whether or not an inbound request is from a trusted host. If an attacker can poison the DNS cache, they can gain trusted status.
Vulnerable Java
The following code authenticates users.
String sourceIP = request.getRemoteAddr();
if (sourceIP != null && sourceIP.equals(APPROVED_IP)) {
authenticated = true;
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-290
- Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
- Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
- Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
- Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
- Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
How to detect CWE-290
Exécuter des tests de sécurité applicative dynamique (DAST) contre le point de terminaison en ligne.
Surveiller les journaux runtime pour détecter des traces d'exception inhabituelles, des entrées malformées ou des tentatives de contournement d'autorisation.
Revue de code : signaler tout nouveau code qui traite les entrées de cette surface sans utiliser les helpers du framework validés.
Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.
Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.
Frequently asked questions
Qu'est-ce que CWE-290 ?
This weakness occurs when an application's authentication system can be tricked into accepting forged or manipulated credentials, allowing unauthorized access without proper verification.
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-290 ?
MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-290 ?
MITRE n'a pas spécifié les plateformes affectées pour ce CWE — il peut s'appliquer à la plupart des stacks applicatives.
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-290 ?
Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-290 ?
Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-290 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-290 ?
MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/290.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.
Weaknesses related to CWE-290
Weak Authentication
This vulnerability occurs when a system's login or identity verification process is too easy to bypass or fool. While it attempts to check…
Use of Weak Credentials
This vulnerability occurs when a system relies on weak authentication credentials—like default passwords, hard-coded keys, or easily…
Not Using Password Aging
This vulnerability occurs when a system lacks password expiration policies, allowing users to keep the same password indefinitely.
Password Aging with Long Expiration
The system enforces password changes, but the time allowed between changes is excessively long, weakening security.
Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name
This vulnerability occurs when a system checks access based on a resource or user name, but fails to account for all the different names…
Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay
This vulnerability occurs when an attacker can intercept and record legitimate authentication traffic, then replay it later to gain…
Reflection Attack in an Authentication Protocol
A reflection attack is a flaw in mutual authentication protocols that allows an attacker to impersonate a legitimate user without knowing…
Authentication Bypass by Assumed-Immutable Data
This vulnerability occurs when an authentication system incorrectly treats certain data as unchangeable, when in fact an attacker can…
Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
This weakness occurs when a developer implements a standard authentication algorithm, but makes critical mistakes in the code that cause…
Prêt à valider ce qui compte.
Plexicus est Proof-Driven AppSec : findings validés, compréhension contextuelle et remédiation relue — ancrée dans la preuve, scopée avec vous.