CWE-776 Base Draft Medium likelihood

Improper Restriction of Recursive Entity References in DTDs ('XML Entity Expansion')

This vulnerability occurs when an XML parser allows Document Type Definitions (DTDs) to contain recursively defined entities without proper limits, enabling malicious data structures.

Definition

What is CWE-776?

This vulnerability occurs when an XML parser allows Document Type Definitions (DTDs) to contain recursively defined entities without proper limits, enabling malicious data structures.
Attackers can craft a malicious DTD that defines XML entities in a recursive loop—where one entity references another, which then references back to the first, creating a chain. When the parser expands these entities, what looks like a small XML file in memory explodes into a massive data structure, consuming excessive CPU and memory. This results in a classic Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack, often called 'XML Entity Expansion' or 'Billion Laughs.' To prevent it, developers should disable DTD processing entirely in their XML parsers when possible, or explicitly configure them to restrict entity expansion depth and total memory usage during parsing.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-776

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    Identifiziere einen Codepfad, der nicht vertrauenswürdige Eingaben ohne Validierung verarbeitet.

  2. 2

    Erzeuge eine Payload, die das unsichere Verhalten auslöst — Injection, Traversal, Overflow oder Logik-Missbrauch.

  3. 3

    Liefere die Payload über einen normalen Request aus und beobachte die Reaktion der Anwendung.

  4. 4

    Iteriere, bis die Antwort Daten preisgibt, Angreifer-Code ausführt oder Berechtigungen eskaliert.

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable XML

The DTD and the very brief XML below illustrate what is meant by an XML bomb. The ZERO entity contains one character, the letter A. The choice of entity name ZERO is being used to indicate length equivalent to that exponent on two, that is, the length of ZERO is 2^0. Similarly, ONE refers to ZERO twice, therefore the XML parser will expand ONE to a length of 2, or 2^1. Ultimately, we reach entity THIRTYTWO, which will expand to 2^32 characters in length, or 4 GB, probably consuming far more data than expected.

Verwundbar XML
<?xml version="1.0"?>
  <!DOCTYPE MaliciousDTD [
  <!ENTITY ZERO "A">
  <!ENTITY ONE "&ZERO;&ZERO;">
  <!ENTITY TWO "&ONE;&ONE;">
  ...
  <!ENTITY THIRTYTWO "&THIRTYONE;&THIRTYONE;">
  ]>
  <data>&THIRTYTWO;</data>
Angreifer-Payload

The DTD and the very brief XML below illustrate what is meant by an XML bomb. The ZERO entity contains one character, the letter A. The choice of entity name ZERO is being used to indicate length equivalent to that exponent on two, that is, the length of ZERO is 2^0. Similarly, ONE refers to ZERO twice, therefore the XML parser will expand ONE to a length of 2, or 2^1. Ultimately, we reach entity THIRTYTWO, which will expand to 2^32 characters in length, or 4 GB, probably consuming far more data than expected.

Angreifer-Payload XML
<?xml version="1.0"?>
  <!DOCTYPE MaliciousDTD [
  <!ENTITY ZERO "A">
  <!ENTITY ONE "&ZERO;&ZERO;">
  <!ENTITY TWO "&ONE;&ONE;">
  ...
  <!ENTITY THIRTYTWO "&THIRTYONE;&THIRTYONE;">
  ]>
  <data>&THIRTYTWO;</data>
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure pseudo

Sicher pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-776

  • Operation If possible, prohibit the use of DTDs or use an XML parser that limits the expansion of recursive DTD entities.
  • Implementation Before parsing XML files with associated DTDs, scan for recursive entity declarations and do not continue parsing potentially explosive content.
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-776

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

CWE-776

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-776?

This vulnerability occurs when an XML parser allows Document Type Definitions (DTDs) to contain recursively defined entities without proper limits, enabling malicious data structures.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-776?

MITRE stuft die Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit als mittel ein — eine Ausnutzung ist realistisch, erfordert aber meist bestimmte Bedingungen.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-776 betroffen?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: XML.

Wie kann ich CWE-776 verhindern?

If possible, prohibit the use of DTDs or use an XML parser that limits the expansion of recursive DTD entities. Before parsing XML files with associated DTDs, scan for recursive entity declarations and do not continue parsing potentially explosive content.

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-776?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-776 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-776?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/776.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Bereit, das Wesentliche zu validieren?

Bereit zu validieren, was zählt.

Plexicus ist Proof-Driven AppSec: validierte Funde, kontextuelles Verständnis und geprüfte Remediation — in Evidenz verankert, mit Ihnen gescoped.

Qualifizierung

Prüfen Sie, ob AI Swarm Pentest zu Ihrer Umgebung passt.

Teilen Sie den wichtigsten Kontext. Wir prüfen den Umfang und nennen den nächsten kommerziellen Schritt.

Vor dem Absenden — prüfen Sie, ob Sie passen

0 / 280

Keine Verpflichtung. Wenn Sie nicht passen, sagen wir es Ihnen.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Private Runde Für Investoren