CWE-643 Base Incomplete High likelihood

Improper Neutralization of Data within XPath Expressions ('XPath Injection')

XPath Injection occurs when an application uses unvalidated user input to build an XPath query for an XML database. Without proper sanitization, attackers can manipulate the query's structure.

Definition

What is CWE-643?

XPath Injection occurs when an application uses unvalidated user input to build an XPath query for an XML database. Without proper sanitization, attackers can manipulate the query's structure.
This vulnerability allows an attacker to alter the intended logic of the XPath expression. By injecting special characters or control sequences, they can change which data is retrieved from the XML source, potentially bypassing application logic, authentication, or access controls. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized data exposure, information disclosure, or manipulation of application flow. Developers must treat all user input used in XPath queries as untrusted and implement proper validation or parameterization to prevent these attacks.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-643

Bisher sind in MITREs Katalog keine öffentlichen CVE-Referenzen mit dieser CWE verknüpft.

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    Consider the following simple XML document that stores authentication information and a snippet of Java code that uses XPath query to retrieve authentication information:

  2. 2

    The Java code used to retrieve the home directory based on the provided credentials is:

  3. 3

    Assume that user "john" wishes to leverage XPath Injection and login without a valid password. By providing a username "john" and password "' or ''='" the XPath expression now becomes

  4. 4

    This lets user "john" login without a valid password, thus bypassing authentication.

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable Java

The Java code used to retrieve the home directory based on the provided credentials is:

Verwundbar Java
XPath xpath = XPathFactory.newInstance().newXPath();
  XPathExpression xlogin = xpath.compile("//users/user[login/text()='" + login.getUserName() + "' and password/text() = '" + login.getPassword() + "']/home_dir/text()");
  Document d = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance().newDocumentBuilder().parse(new File("db.xml"));
  String homedir = xlogin.evaluate(d);
Angreifer-Payload

Assume that user "john" wishes to leverage XPath Injection and login without a valid password. By providing a username "john" and password "' or ''='" the XPath expression now becomes

Angreifer-Payload
//users/user[login/text()='john' or ''='' and password/text() = '' or ''='']/home_dir/text()
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure pseudo

Sicher pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-643

  • Implementation Use parameterized XPath queries (e.g. using XQuery). This will help ensure separation between data plane and control plane.
  • Implementation Properly validate user input. Reject data where appropriate, filter where appropriate and escape where appropriate. Make sure input that will be used in XPath queries is safe in that context.
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-643

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

CWE-643

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-643?

XPath Injection occurs when an application uses unvalidated user input to build an XPath query for an XML database. Without proper sanitization, attackers can manipulate the query's structure.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-643?

MITRE stuft die Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit als hoch ein — diese Schwachstelle wird aktiv in freier Wildbahn ausgenutzt und sollte priorisiert behoben werden.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-643 betroffen?

MITRE hat für diese CWE keine betroffenen Plattformen spezifiziert — sie kann in den meisten Anwendungs-Stacks auftreten.

Wie kann ich CWE-643 verhindern?

Use parameterized XPath queries (e.g. using XQuery). This will help ensure separation between data plane and control plane. Properly validate user input. Reject data where appropriate, filter where appropriate and escape where appropriate. Make sure input that will be used in XPath queries is safe in that context.

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-643?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-643 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-643?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/643.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Bereit, das Wesentliche zu validieren?

Bereit zu validieren, was zählt.

Plexicus ist Proof-Driven AppSec: validierte Funde, kontextuelles Verständnis und geprüfte Remediation — in Evidenz verankert, mit Ihnen gescoped.

Qualifizierung

Prüfen Sie, ob AI Swarm Pentest zu Ihrer Umgebung passt.

Teilen Sie den wichtigsten Kontext. Wir prüfen den Umfang und nennen den nächsten kommerziellen Schritt.

Vor dem Absenden — prüfen Sie, ob Sie passen

0 / 280

Keine Verpflichtung. Wenn Sie nicht passen, sagen wir es Ihnen.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Private Runde Für Investoren