CWE-256 Base Incomplete High likelihood

Plaintext Storage of a Password

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores user passwords as readable text instead of using secure, one-way hashing. This insecure practice exposes credentials in memory, files, or…

Definition

What is CWE-256?

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores user passwords as readable text instead of using secure, one-way hashing. This insecure practice exposes credentials in memory, files, or databases where attackers can easily retrieve them.
Storing passwords in plaintext is a critical security failure because it completely bypasses the fundamental purpose of password protection. If an attacker gains access to the storage—through a database breach, a leaked file, or a memory dump—they immediately obtain all user credentials. This often leads to account takeover, data theft, and lateral movement across systems, as users frequently reuse passwords. To prevent this, developers must never store the actual password. Instead, always use a strong, adaptive cryptographic hash function (like Argon2, scrypt, or bcrypt) with a unique salt for each password. This transforms the password into a fixed-length, irreversible string. Even if the hash is exposed, the original password remains computationally infeasible to recover, significantly limiting the damage of a data breach.
Vulnerability Diagram CWE-256
Plaintext Storage of Password User signs up pw="hunter2" users table name | password alice | hunter2 bob | letmein eve | qwerty DB dump → all passwords credential stuffing Passwords must be salted+hashed (bcrypt/argon2), never stored plain.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-256

  • Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) uses a driver that relies on a password stored in plaintext.

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    The following code reads a password from a properties file and uses the password to connect to a database.

  2. 2

    This code will run successfully, but anyone who has access to config.properties can read the value of password. If a devious employee has access to this information, they can use it to break into the system.

  3. 3

    The following code reads a password from the registry and uses the password to create a new network credential.

  4. 4

    This code will run successfully, but anyone who has access to the registry key used to store the password can read the value of password. If a devious employee has access to this information, they can use it to break into the system

  5. 5

    The following examples show a portion of properties and configuration files for Java and ASP.NET applications. The files include username and password information but they are stored in cleartext.

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable Java

The following code reads a password from a properties file and uses the password to connect to a database.

Verwundbar Java
...
  Properties prop = new Properties();
  prop.load(new FileInputStream("config.properties"));
  String password = prop.getProperty("password");
  DriverManager.getConnection(url, usr, password);
  ...
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure pseudo

Sicher pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-256

  • Architecture and Design Avoid storing passwords in easily accessible locations.
  • Architecture and Design Consider storing cryptographic hashes of passwords as an alternative to storing in plaintext.
  • A programmer might attempt to remedy the password management problem by obscuring the password with an encoding function, such as base 64 encoding, but this effort does not adequately protect the password because the encoding can be detected and decoded easily.
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-256

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

CWE-256

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-256?

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores user passwords as readable text instead of using secure, one-way hashing. This insecure practice exposes credentials in memory, files, or databases where attackers can easily retrieve them.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-256?

MITRE stuft die Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit als hoch ein — diese Schwachstelle wird aktiv in freier Wildbahn ausgenutzt und sollte priorisiert behoben werden.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-256 betroffen?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: ICS/OT.

Wie kann ich CWE-256 verhindern?

Avoid storing passwords in easily accessible locations. Consider storing cryptographic hashes of passwords as an alternative to storing in plaintext.

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-256?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-256 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-256?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/256.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Bereit, das Wesentliche zu validieren?

Bereit zu validieren, was zählt.

Plexicus ist Proof-Driven AppSec: validierte Funde, kontextuelles Verständnis und geprüfte Remediation — in Evidenz verankert, mit Ihnen gescoped.

Qualifizierung

Prüfen Sie, ob AI Swarm Pentest zu Ihrer Umgebung passt.

Teilen Sie den wichtigsten Kontext. Wir prüfen den Umfang und nennen den nächsten kommerziellen Schritt.

Vor dem Absenden — prüfen Sie, ob Sie passen

0 / 280

Keine Verpflichtung. Wenn Sie nicht passen, sagen wir es Ihnen.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Private Runde Für Investoren