CWE-1342 Base Incomplete

Information Exposure through Microarchitectural State after Transient Execution

This vulnerability occurs when a CPU fails to completely erase temporary data traces left behind by speculative execution or error recovery processes. These lingering microarchitectural hints can be…

Definition

What is CWE-1342?

This vulnerability occurs when a CPU fails to completely erase temporary data traces left behind by speculative execution or error recovery processes. These lingering microarchitectural hints can be analyzed through side-channels to leak sensitive information.
Modern CPUs use techniques like speculative execution and microcode assists to boost performance. When these operations are canceled or encounter errors, the processor should fully clean up. However, if remnants of these transient computations persist in internal buffers (like load/store queues), they create a measurable change in the chip's hidden state. An attacker can then use timing or other side-channel attacks to infer protected data, such as secrets from other processes or virtual machines. Successful exploitation typically requires three conditions: first, vulnerable code must speculatively access sensitive information, leaving microarchitectural traces. Second, the attacker must be able to trigger the specific CPU exceptions or mis-speculations that create these traces. Finally, the attacker needs a method to observe the state change, often by analyzing cache timing or other hardware resource contention, to slowly reconstruct the leaked data.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1342

  • Load value injection in some processors utilizing speculative execution may allow an authenticated user to enable information disclosure via a side-channel with local access.

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    Faulting loads in a victim domain may trigger incorrect transient forwarding, which leaves secret-dependent traces in the microarchitectural state. Consider this example from [REF-1203].

  2. 2

    Consider the code gadget:

  3. 3

    A processor with this weakness will store the value of untrusted_arg (which may be provided by an attacker) to the stack, which is trusted memory. Additionally, this store operation will save this value in some microarchitectural buffer, e.g. the store queue. In this code gadget, trusted_ptr is dereferenced while the attacker forces a page fault. The faulting load causes the processor to mis-speculate by forwarding untrusted_arg as the (speculative) load result. The processor then uses untrusted_arg for the pointer dereference. After the fault has been handled and the load has been re-issued with the correct argument, secret-dependent information stored at the address of trusted_ptr remains in microarchitectural state and can be extracted by an attacker using a code gadget.

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable C

Consider the code gadget:

Verwundbar C
void call_victim(size_t untrusted_arg) {
  	 *arg_copy = untrusted_arg;
  	 array[**trusted_ptr * 4096];
   }
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure pseudo

Sicher pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-1342

  • Architecture and Design / Requirements Hardware ensures that no illegal data flows from faulting micro-ops exists at the microarchitectural level.
  • Build and Compilation Include instructions that explicitly remove traces of unneeded computations from software interactions with microarchitectural elements e.g. lfence, sfence, mfence, clflush.
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-1342

SAST High

Führe statische Analyse (SAST) auf der Codebasis aus und suche im Datenfluss nach dem unsicheren Muster.

DAST Moderate

Führe dynamische Application-Security-Tests gegen den Live-Endpoint aus.

Runtime Moderate

Beobachte Runtime-Logs auf ungewöhnliche Exception-Traces, fehlerhafte Eingaben oder Versuche, Autorisierung zu umgehen.

Code review Moderate

Code Review: Markiere jeden neuen Code, der Eingaben von dieser Oberfläche ohne validierte Framework-Helper verarbeitet.

CWE-1342

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-1342?

This vulnerability occurs when a CPU fails to completely erase temporary data traces left behind by speculative execution or error recovery processes. These lingering microarchitectural hints can be analyzed through side-channels to leak sensitive information.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-1342?

MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-1342 betroffen?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Workstation, x86, ARM, Other, Not Technology-Specific, System on Chip.

Wie kann ich CWE-1342 verhindern?

Hardware ensures that no illegal data flows from faulting micro-ops exists at the microarchitectural level. Include instructions that explicitly remove traces of unneeded computations from software interactions with microarchitectural elements e.g. lfence, sfence, mfence, clflush.

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-1342?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-1342 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-1342?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1342.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Bereit, das Wesentliche zu validieren?

Bereit zu validieren, was zählt.

Plexicus ist Proof-Driven AppSec: validierte Funde, kontextuelles Verständnis und geprüfte Remediation — in Evidenz verankert, mit Ihnen gescoped.

Qualifizierung

Prüfen Sie, ob AI Swarm Pentest zu Ihrer Umgebung passt.

Teilen Sie den wichtigsten Kontext. Wir prüfen den Umfang und nennen den nächsten kommerziellen Schritt.

Vor dem Absenden — prüfen Sie, ob Sie passen

0 / 280

Keine Verpflichtung. Wenn Sie nicht passen, sagen wir es Ihnen.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Private Runde Für Investoren