CWE-1249 Base Incomplete

Application-Level Admin Tool with Inconsistent View of Underlying Operating System

This vulnerability occurs when an administrative tool (like a web interface or API) fails to accurately display the true state of the underlying operating system it manages. The tool's view becomes…

Definition

What is CWE-1249?

This vulnerability occurs when an administrative tool (like a web interface or API) fails to accurately display the true state of the underlying operating system it manages. The tool's view becomes inconsistent with reality, hiding critical resources like user accounts, processes, or files from the administrator.
Administrative tools for cloud platforms, network devices, or IoT systems often manage OS-level resources like user accounts. A critical security gap emerges when this management layer loses synchronization with the actual OS state. For instance, if an attacker adds a user account directly to the OS, this 'ghost account' might remain invisible in the admin panel. This discrepancy allows malicious activity to go undetected, as administrators rely on an incomplete and misleading view of their system's security posture. Attackers exploit this weakness by creating persistent backdoor accounts, often by chaining it with other vulnerabilities like command injection or logic flaws. A rogue administrator could also hide accounts for later use. Since the management tool doesn't reflect these changes, standard administrative reviews won't uncover them, allowing threats to persist undetected. Ensuring the management application's data model is always synchronized with a single, authoritative source of truth in the OS is essential for maintaining visibility and control.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1249

Bisher sind in MITREs Katalog keine öffentlichen CVE-Referenzen mit dieser CWE verknüpft.

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    Suppose that an attacker successfully gains root privileges on a Linux system and adds a new 'user2' account:

  2. 2

    This new user2 account would not be noticed on the web interface, if the interface does not refresh its data of available users.

  3. 3

    It could be argued that for this specific example, an attacker with root privileges would be likely to compromise the admin tool or otherwise feed it with false data. However, this example shows how the discrepancy in critical data can help attackers to escape detection.

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable Other

Suppose that an attacker successfully gains root privileges on a Linux system and adds a new 'user2' account:

Verwundbar Other
echo "user2:x:0:0::/root:/" >> /etc/passwd;
  echo "user2:\$6\$IdvyrM6VJnG8Su5U\$1gmW3Nm.IO4vxTQDQ1C8urm72JCadOHZQwqiH/nRtL8dPY80xS4Ovsv5bPCMWnXKKWwmsocSWXupUf17LB3oS.:17256:0:99999:7:::" >> /etc/shadow;
Angreifer-Payload

Suppose that an attacker successfully gains root privileges on a Linux system and adds a new 'user2' account:

Angreifer-Payload Other
echo "user2:x:0:0::/root:/" >> /etc/passwd;
  echo "user2:\$6\$IdvyrM6VJnG8Su5U\$1gmW3Nm.IO4vxTQDQ1C8urm72JCadOHZQwqiH/nRtL8dPY80xS4Ovsv5bPCMWnXKKWwmsocSWXupUf17LB3oS.:17256:0:99999:7:::" >> /etc/shadow;
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure pseudo

Sicher pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-1249

  • Architecture and Design Ensure that the admin tool refreshes its model of the underlying OS on a regular basis, and note any inconsistencies with configuration files or other data sources that are expected to have the same data.
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-1249

SAST High

Führe statische Analyse (SAST) auf der Codebasis aus und suche im Datenfluss nach dem unsicheren Muster.

DAST Moderate

Führe dynamische Application-Security-Tests gegen den Live-Endpoint aus.

Runtime Moderate

Beobachte Runtime-Logs auf ungewöhnliche Exception-Traces, fehlerhafte Eingaben oder Versuche, Autorisierung zu umgehen.

Code review Moderate

Code Review: Markiere jeden neuen Code, der Eingaben von dieser Oberfläche ohne validierte Framework-Helper verarbeitet.

CWE-1249

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-1249?

This vulnerability occurs when an administrative tool (like a web interface or API) fails to accurately display the true state of the underlying operating system it manages. The tool's view becomes inconsistent with reality, hiding critical resources like user accounts, processes, or files from the administrator.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-1249?

MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-1249 betroffen?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Web Based.

Wie kann ich CWE-1249 verhindern?

Ensure that the admin tool refreshes its model of the underlying OS on a regular basis, and note any inconsistencies with configuration files or other data sources that are expected to have the same data.

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-1249?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-1249 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-1249?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1249.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Bereit, das Wesentliche zu validieren?

Bereit zu validieren, was zählt.

Plexicus ist Proof-Driven AppSec: validierte Funde, kontextuelles Verständnis und geprüfte Remediation — in Evidenz verankert, mit Ihnen gescoped.

Qualifizierung

Prüfen Sie, ob AI Swarm Pentest zu Ihrer Umgebung passt.

Teilen Sie den wichtigsten Kontext. Wir prüfen den Umfang und nennen den nächsten kommerziellen Schritt.

Vor dem Absenden — prüfen Sie, ob Sie passen

0 / 280

Keine Verpflichtung. Wenn Sie nicht passen, sagen wir es Ihnen.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Private Runde Für Investoren