CWE-1223 Base Incomplete

Race Condition for Write-Once Attributes

This vulnerability occurs when an untrusted software component wins a race condition and writes to a hardware register before the trusted component can, permanently locking in an insecure value…

Definition

What is CWE-1223?

This vulnerability occurs when an untrusted software component wins a race condition and writes to a hardware register before the trusted component can, permanently locking in an insecure value because the register is designed to be written only once.
In hardware design, critical security settings are often stored in write-once registers. These registers allow software to set a value—like a system configuration or a security policy—a single time after a reset, after which they become read-only. This mechanism is intended to let trusted boot firmware establish a secure baseline that untrusted runtime software cannot later alter. A security flaw emerges when the hardware design does not properly sequence access to these registers. If an untrusted software module (Module B) can issue a write command before the trusted module (Module A) does, the untrusted value gets permanently locked in. The trusted module's subsequent write is ignored, leaving the system configured with potentially insecure or incorrect settings for its entire operational lifetime.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1223

Bisher sind in MITREs Katalog keine öffentlichen CVE-Referenzen mit dieser CWE verknüpft.

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    Identifiziere einen Codepfad, der nicht vertrauenswürdige Eingaben ohne Validierung verarbeitet.

  2. 2

    Erzeuge eine Payload, die das unsichere Verhalten auslöst — Injection, Traversal, Overflow oder Logik-Missbrauch.

  3. 3

    Liefere die Payload über einen normalen Request aus und beobachte die Reaktion der Anwendung.

  4. 4

    Iteriere, bis die Antwort Daten preisgibt, Angreifer-Code ausführt oder Berechtigungen eskaliert.

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable Verilog

consider the example design module system verilog code shown below. register_write_once_example module is an example of register that has a write-once field defined. Bit 0 field captures the write_once_status value.

Verwundbar Verilog
module register_write_once_example
 (

```
   input [15:0] Data_in,
   input Clk,
   input ip_resetn,
   input global_resetn,
   input write,
   output reg [15:0] Data_out
 );
 reg Write_once_status;
 always @(posedge Clk or negedge ip_resetn)
 if (~ip_resetn)
   begin
  	 Data_out <= 16'h0000; 
  	 Write_once_status <= 1'b0;
   end
 else if (write & ~Write_once_status) 
   begin
  	 Data_out <= Data_in & 16'hFFFE; // Input data written to register after masking bit 0
  	 Write_once_status <= 1'b1; // Write once status set after first write.
   end
 else if (~write)
   begin
  	 Data_out[15:1] <= Data_out[15:1];
  	 Data_out[0] <= Write_once_status;
   end
 endmodule
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure Other

The first system component that sends a write cycle to this register can program the value. This could result in a race condition security issue in the SoC design, if an untrusted agent is running in the system in parallel with the trusted component that is expected to program the register.

Sicher Other
Trusted firmware or software trying to set the write-once field: 

  - Must confirm the Write_once_status (bit 0) value is zero, before programming register. If another agent has programmed the register before, then Write_once_status value will be one.

  - After writing to the register, the trusted software can issue a read to confirm that the valid setting has been programmed.
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-1223

  • Architecture and Design During hardware design all register write-once or sticky fields must be evaluated for proper configuration.
  • Testing The testing phase should use automated tools to test that values are not reprogrammable and that write-once fields lock on writing zeros.
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-1223

SAST High

Führe statische Analyse (SAST) auf der Codebasis aus und suche im Datenfluss nach dem unsicheren Muster.

DAST Moderate

Führe dynamische Application-Security-Tests gegen den Live-Endpoint aus.

Runtime Moderate

Beobachte Runtime-Logs auf ungewöhnliche Exception-Traces, fehlerhafte Eingaben oder Versuche, Autorisierung zu umgehen.

Code review Moderate

Code Review: Markiere jeden neuen Code, der Eingaben von dieser Oberfläche ohne validierte Framework-Helper verarbeitet.

CWE-1223

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-1223?

This vulnerability occurs when an untrusted software component wins a race condition and writes to a hardware register before the trusted component can, permanently locking in an insecure value because the register is designed to be written only once.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-1223?

MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-1223 betroffen?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Verilog, VHDL, System on Chip.

Wie kann ich CWE-1223 verhindern?

During hardware design all register write-once or sticky fields must be evaluated for proper configuration. The testing phase should use automated tools to test that values are not reprogrammable and that write-once fields lock on writing zeros.

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-1223?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-1223 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-1223?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1223.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Verwandte Schwachstellen

Weaknesses related to CWE-1223

CWE-362 Parent

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

A race condition occurs when multiple processes or threads access a shared resource simultaneously without proper coordination, creating a…

CWE-1298 Sibling

Hardware Logic Contains Race Conditions

A hardware race condition occurs when security-critical logic circuits receive signals at slightly different times, creating temporary…

CWE-364 Sibling

Signal Handler Race Condition

A signal handler race condition occurs when a program's signal handling routine is vulnerable to timing issues, allowing its state to be…

CWE-366 Sibling

Race Condition within a Thread

This vulnerability occurs when two or more threads within the same application access and manipulate a shared resource (like a variable,…

CWE-367 Sibling

Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition

This vulnerability occurs when a program verifies a resource's state (like a file's permissions or existence) but then uses it after that…

CWE-368 Sibling

Context Switching Race Condition

This vulnerability occurs when an application switches between different security contexts (like privilege levels or domains) using a…

CWE-421 Sibling

Race Condition During Access to Alternate Channel

A race condition occurs when an application opens a secondary communication channel intended for an authorized user, but fails to secure…

CWE-689 Sibling

Permission Race Condition During Resource Copy

This vulnerability occurs when a system copies a file or resource but delays setting its final permissions until the entire copy operation…

Bereit, das Wesentliche zu validieren?

Bereit zu validieren, was zählt.

Plexicus ist Proof-Driven AppSec: validierte Funde, kontextuelles Verständnis und geprüfte Remediation — in Evidenz verankert, mit Ihnen gescoped.

Qualifizierung

Prüfen Sie, ob AI Swarm Pentest zu Ihrer Umgebung passt.

Teilen Sie den wichtigsten Kontext. Wir prüfen den Umfang und nennen den nächsten kommerziellen Schritt.

Vor dem Absenden — prüfen Sie, ob Sie passen

0 / 280

Keine Verpflichtung. Wenn Sie nicht passen, sagen wir es Ihnen.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Private Runde Für Investoren