CWE-1188 Base Incomplete

Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default

This vulnerability occurs when software uses an insecure default setting or value for a resource, assuming an administrator will change it later.

Definition

What is CWE-1188?

This vulnerability occurs when software uses an insecure default setting or value for a resource, assuming an administrator will change it later.
Developers often set open, permissive defaults to make a product easy to install and use right away. The security model relies entirely on the administrator remembering to change these defaults to a more secure configuration, which is a risky assumption. This creates an 'out-of-the-box' vulnerability where the system is insecure from the moment it's installed. The resulting security gap remains until an admin takes action, leaving a window of exposure that attackers can easily discover and exploit.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1188

  • insecure default variable initialization in BIOS firmware for a hardware board allows DoS

  • A generic database browser interface has a default mode that exposes a web server to the network, allowing queries to the database.

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    This code attempts to login a user using credentials from a POST request:

  2. 2

    Because the $authorized variable is never initialized, PHP will automatically set $authorized to any value included in the POST request if register_globals is enabled. An attacker can send a POST request with an unexpected third value 'authorized' set to 'true' and gain authorized status without supplying valid credentials.

  3. 3

    Here is a fixed version:

  4. 4

    This code avoids the issue by initializing the $authorized variable to false and explicitly retrieving the login credentials from the $_POST variable. Regardless, register_globals should never be enabled and is disabled by default in current versions of PHP.

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable PHP

This code attempts to login a user using credentials from a POST request:

Verwundbar PHP
```
// $user and $pass automatically set from POST request* 
  if (login_user($user,$pass)) {
  ```
  	$authorized = true;
  }
```
...* 
  
  if ($authorized) {
  ```
  	generatePage();
  }
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure PHP

Here is a fixed version:

Sicher PHP
$user = $_POST['user'];
  $pass = $_POST['pass'];
  $authorized = false;
  if (login_user($user,$pass)) {
  	$authorized = true;
  }
```
...*
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-1188

  • Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
  • Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
  • Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
  • Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
  • Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-1188

SAST High

Führe statische Analyse (SAST) auf der Codebasis aus und suche im Datenfluss nach dem unsicheren Muster.

DAST Moderate

Führe dynamische Application-Security-Tests gegen den Live-Endpoint aus.

Runtime Moderate

Beobachte Runtime-Logs auf ungewöhnliche Exception-Traces, fehlerhafte Eingaben oder Versuche, Autorisierung zu umgehen.

Code review Moderate

Code Review: Markiere jeden neuen Code, der Eingaben von dieser Oberfläche ohne validierte Framework-Helper verarbeitet.

CWE-1188

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-1188?

This vulnerability occurs when software uses an insecure default setting or value for a resource, assuming an administrator will change it later.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-1188?

MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-1188 betroffen?

MITRE hat für diese CWE keine betroffenen Plattformen spezifiziert — sie kann in den meisten Anwendungs-Stacks auftreten.

Wie kann ich CWE-1188 verhindern?

Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-1188?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-1188 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-1188?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1188.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Bereit, das Wesentliche zu validieren?

Bereit zu validieren, was zählt.

Plexicus ist Proof-Driven AppSec: validierte Funde, kontextuelles Verständnis und geprüfte Remediation — in Evidenz verankert, mit Ihnen gescoped.

Qualifizierung

Prüfen Sie, ob AI Swarm Pentest zu Ihrer Umgebung passt.

Teilen Sie den wichtigsten Kontext. Wir prüfen den Umfang und nennen den nächsten kommerziellen Schritt.

Vor dem Absenden — prüfen Sie, ob Sie passen

0 / 280

Keine Verpflichtung. Wenn Sie nicht passen, sagen wir es Ihnen.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorized target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)
Private Runde Für Investoren